Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 14;137(2):168-177.
doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007702.

Optimizing therapy in the modern age: differences in length of maintenance therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Affiliations

Optimizing therapy in the modern age: differences in length of maintenance therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

David T Teachey et al. Blood. .

Abstract

A majority of children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are cured with contemporary multiagent chemotherapy regimens. The high rate of survival is largely the result of 70 years of randomized clinical trials performed by international cooperative groups. Contemporary ALL therapy usually consists of cycles of multiagent chemotherapy administered over 2 to 3 years that includes central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis, primarily consisting of CNS-penetrating systemic agents and intrathecal therapy. Although the treatment backbones vary among cooperative groups, the same agents are used, and the outcomes are comparable. ALL therapy typically begins with 5 to 9 months of more-intensive chemotherapy followed by a prolonged low-intensity maintenance phase. Historically, a few cooperative groups treated boys with 1 more year of maintenance therapy than girls; however, most groups treated boys and girls with equal therapy lengths. This practice arose because of inferior survival in boys with older less-intensive regimens. The extra year of therapy added significant burden to patients and families and involved short- and long-term risks that were potentially life threatening and debilitating. The Children's Oncology Group recently changed its approach as part of its current generation of trials in B-cell ALL and now treats boys and girls with the same duration of therapy. We discuss the rationale behind this change, review the data and differences in practice across cooperative groups, and provide our perspective regarding the length of maintenance therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: D.T.T. serves on advisory boards for Janssen, Amgen, La Roche, Sobi, and Humanigen. S.P.H. owns stock in Amgen and has received consulting fees from Novartis and honoraria from Amgen. M.L.L. serves on the advisory board for MediSix Therapeutics.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
ALL therapy. Classic phases of ALL therapy. The approach is similar across cooperative groups; however, the nomenclature is different. (A) Names of phases used by some cooperative groups, including the Children’s Oncology Group (COG). (B) Names of phases used by other groups, including the Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (BFM). The first phase of therapy (induction or induction 1A) consists of 3 to 4 agents and lasts ∼4 weeks, with the goal of achieving remission. This is followed by 3 to 4 months of therapy to consolidate remission. These blocks classically include 1 to 2 months of multiagent chemotherapy with CNS prophylaxis and 2 months of further intensification using a variety of methotrexate-based regimens. The blocks are termed consolidation and interim maintenance (IM) by the COG and induction IB and protocol M by the BFM. The third phase of therapy is intensification, termed delayed intensification (DI) by the COG and protocol II by the BFM. Intensification essentially repeats the therapy used in the first 3 months, with substitution of some agents with drugs in the same class. Finally, the fourth phase of therapy is termed maintenance and consists of low-intensity chemotherapy lasting for 1 to 3 years. Some protocols include a second IM and/or a second DI after DI/protocol II and before maintenance.

References

    1. Hunger SP, Lu X, Devidas M, et al. . Improved survival for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia between 1990 and 2005: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1663-1669. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simone JV History of the treatment of childhood ALL: a paradigm for cancer cure. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2006;19(2):353-359. - PubMed
    1. Farber S, Diamond LK. Temporary remissions in acute leukemia in children produced by folic acid antagonist, 4-aminopteroyl-glutamic acid. N Engl J Med. 1948;238(23):787-793. - PubMed
    1. Elion GB, Bieber S, Hitchings GH. A summary of investigations with 2-amino-6-[(1-methyl-4-nitro-5-imidazolyl)thio]purine (B.W. 57-323) in animals. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1960;8:36-43. - PubMed
    1. Pinkel D Therapy of acute lymphoid leukemia in children. Leukemia. 1992;6(suppl 2):127-131. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms