Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 2;222(Suppl 5):S218-S229.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa318.

Use of Population-Based Surveys for Estimating the Population Size of Persons Who Inject Drugs in the United States

Affiliations

Use of Population-Based Surveys for Estimating the Population Size of Persons Who Inject Drugs in the United States

Heather Bradley et al. J Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: In the United States, injection is an increasingly common route of administration for opioids and other substances. Estimates of the number of persons who inject drugs (PWID) are needed for monitoring risk-specific infectious disease rates and health services coverage.

Methods: We reviewed design and instruments for 4 national household surveys, 2012-2016, for their ability to produce unbiased injection drug use (IDU) prevalence estimates. We explored potential analytic adjustments for reducing biases through use of external data on (1) arrest, (2) narcotic overdose mortality, and (3) biomarker-based sensitivity of self-reported illicit drug use.

Results: Estimated national past 12 months IDU prevalence ranged from 0.24% to 0.59% across surveys. All surveys excluded unstably housed and incarcerated persons, and estimates were based on <60 respondents reporting IDU behavior in 3 surveys. No surveys asked participants about nonmedical injection of prescription drugs. Analytic adjustments did not appreciably change IDU prevalence estimates due to suboptimal specificity of data points.

Conclusions: PWID population size estimates in the United States are based on small numbers and are likely biased by undercoverage of key populations and self-report. Novel methods as discussed in this article may improve our understanding of PWID population size and their health needs.

Keywords: PWID; injection behavior; population-based surveys.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Framework for evaluating bias in estimates from survey research. Adapted from Hulley et al, Designing Clinical Research, 4th ed [26].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Framework for evaluating bias in estimates from survey research and potential adjustments for reducing bias. Adapted from Hulley et al, Designing Clinical Research, 4th ed [26].

References

    1. Conrad C, Bradley HM, Broz D, et al. ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . community outbreak of HIV infection linked to injection drug use of oxymorphone–Indiana, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015; 64:443–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cranston K, Alpren C, John B, et al. Notes from the field: HIV diagnoses among persons who inject drugs - Northeastern Massachusetts, 2015–2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019; 68:253–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones CM. Trends and key correlates of prescription opioid injection misuse in the United States. Addict Behav 2018; 78:145–52. - PubMed
    1. Jones CM, Christensen A, Gladden RM. Increases in prescription opioid injection abuse among treatment admissions in the United States, 2004–2013. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017; 176:89–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Young AM, Havens JR. Transition from first illicit drug use to first injection drug use among rural Appalachian drug users: a cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis. Addiction 2012; 107:587–96. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms