Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 31;17(17):6344.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176344.

Considering the Potential Health Impacts of Electric Scooters: An Analysis of User Reported Behaviors in Provo, Utah

Jeffrey Glenn  1 , Madeline Bluth  1 , Mannon Christianson  1 , Jaymie Pressley  1 , Austin Taylor  2 , Gregory S Macfarlane  3 , Robert A Chaney  1
Affiliations

Considering the Potential Health Impacts of Electric Scooters: An Analysis of User Reported Behaviors in Provo, Utah

Jeffrey Glenn et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Electric scooters (e-scooters) are an increasingly popular form of transportation in urban areas. While research on this topic has focused primarily on injuries, there are multiple mechanisms by which e-scooter share programs may impact health. The aim of this study is to explore the health-related behaviors of e-scooter users and to discuss their implications for public health. Data were collected using an online survey emailed to registered e-scooter users. A total of 1070 users completed the survey. Descriptive variable statistics and chi-squared analysis were performed to determine variable dependent relationships and equality of proportions. The most common destinations reported were "just riding around for fun", home, and dining/shopping. The two most common modes of transportation that would have been used if e-scooters were not available were walking (43.5%) and using a personal vehicle (28.5%). Riding behavior was equally mixed between on the street, on the sidewalk, and equal amounts of both. e-Scooters in Provo are likely having both positive (e.g., air pollution) and negative impacts on health (e.g., injuries, physical inactivity). Future research should further explore patterns of e-scooter use and explicitly examine the linkages between e-scooters and areas of health beyond just injuries.

Keywords: electric scooters; public health; urban transport.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Linkages between e-scooters and health. Adapted from Khreis et al., 2017 [1].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Density of e-scooter trip points in October 2019. Data from Zagster via Provo City, background streets supplied by OpenStreetMap.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Khreis H., May A.D., Nieuwenhuijsen M.J. Health impacts of urban transport policy measures: A guidance note for practice. J. Transp. Health. 2017;6:209–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2017.06.003. - DOI
    1. Hollingsworth J., Copeland B., Johnson J.X. Are e-scooters polluters? the environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019;14 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8. - DOI
    1. Zhu R., Zhang X., Kondor D., Santi P., Ratti C. Understanding spatio-temporal heterogeneity of bike-sharing and scooter-sharing mobility. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2020;81:101483. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101483. - DOI
    1. van Boven J.F.M., An PLe Kirenga B.J., Chavannes N. Electric scooters: Batteries in the battle against ambient air pollution? Lancet Planet. Health. 2017;1:e168–e169. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30079-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trivedi T.K., Liu C., Antonio A.L.M., Wheaton N., Kreger V., Yap A., Schriger D., Elmore J.G. Injuries Associated With Standing Electric Scooter Use. JAMA Netw. Open. 2019;2:e187381. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7381. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources