Comparative effectiveness and safety of cefotetan and cefoxitin as prophylactic agents in patients undergoing abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy
- PMID: 3287974
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80219-8
Comparative effectiveness and safety of cefotetan and cefoxitin as prophylactic agents in patients undergoing abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy
Abstract
In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, 282 women who underwent abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy were given a single preoperative 2 g dose of cefotetan (171 evaluable patients) or three perioperative 2 g doses of cefoxitin (84 evaluable patients) as antibiotic prophylaxis. A successful clinical response occurred in 92 percent of those receiving cefotetan and 90 percent of those receiving cefoxitin who underwent abdominal hysterectomy, and in 94 percent of those receiving cefotetan and 93 percent of those receiving cefoxitin who underwent vaginal hysterectomy. The incidence of vaginal cuff cellulitis was 3.4 percent and 5 percent for cefotetan and cefoxitin patients, respectively, who underwent abdominal hysterectomy, and 4.8 percent and 4.5 percent, respectively, for those who underwent vaginal hysterectomy. The incidence of major wound infection was 3.4 percent and 2.5 percent for cefotetan and cefoxitin, respectively, in the abdominal hysterectomy group. Postoperative changes in oral body temperature, duration of hospitalization, and postoperative grading of surgical wounds were similar. Both drugs were well tolerated. These results suggest that a single dose of cefotetan is equally effective and as safe as multiple-dose cefoxitin for prophylaxis in patients undergoing hysterectomy.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin prophylaxis for abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;158(3 Pt 2):706-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)44531-x. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988. PMID: 3128112 Clinical Trial.
-
Results of a multicenter comparative study of single-dose cefotetan and multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in patients undergoing cesarean section.Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):86-90. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80220-4. Am J Surg. 1988. PMID: 3287975 Clinical Trial.
-
Cefotetan versus cefoxitin as prophylaxis in hysterectomy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;154(4):960-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90498-9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986. PMID: 3515952 Clinical Trial.
-
[Comparative study of short-term antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis in gynecologic surgery: cefotetan versus cefazolin].Minerva Ginecol. 1989 Mar;41(3):149-55. Minerva Ginecol. 1989. PMID: 2666884 Review. Italian.
-
[The value of antibiotic prophylaxis using cefotetan in high-risk abdominal hysterectomy. Apropos of a prospective randomized study of 71 patients].Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1988 Nov;83(11):737-40. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1988. PMID: 3060967 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Antibiotics for preventing infection at the surgical site: Single dose vs. multiple doses.Saudi Pharm J. 2023 Dec;31(12):101800. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101800. Epub 2023 Sep 26. Saudi Pharm J. 2023. PMID: 38028220 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and tolerance of cefoxitin in the treatment of cefoxitin-susceptible extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales infections in critically ill patients: a retrospective single-center study.Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Sep 30;12(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01059-9. Ann Intensive Care. 2022. PMID: 36175707 Free PMC article.
-
Antibiotic prophylaxis in hysterectomy and induced abortion. A review of the evidence.Drugs. 1991 Jan;41(1):19-37. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199141010-00003. Drugs. 1991. PMID: 1706985 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical