Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Apr;116(4):833-844.
doi: 10.1111/add.15207. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

Familial factors may not explain the effect of moderate-to-heavy cannabis use on cognitive functioning in adolescents: a sibling-comparison study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Familial factors may not explain the effect of moderate-to-heavy cannabis use on cognitive functioning in adolescents: a sibling-comparison study

Jarrod M Ellingson et al. Addiction. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Aims: To examine whether moderate adolescent cannabis use has neurocognitive effects that are unexplained by familial confounds, which prior family-controlled studies may not have identified.

Design: A quasi-experimental, sibling-comparison design was applied to a prospective, observational study of adolescents with moderate cannabis use. Participants were recruited from 2001 to 2006 (mean age = 17 years). A second wave of data was collected from 2008 to 2013 (mean age = 24 years).

Setting: Two US metropolitan communities.

Participants: A total of 1192 adolescents from 596 families participated in this study. Participants were primarily male (64%) and racially and ethnically diverse (non-Hispanic white = 45%). A sibling in each family was a clinical proband identified due to delinquent behaviors. Whereas prior family-controlled studies have used samples of primarily infrequent cannabis users (mean = 1-2 days/month), participants here endorsed levels of cannabis use comparable to findings from epidemiological cohort studies (mean = 7-9 days/month).

Measurements: Semi-structured clinical interviews assessed drug use, and a neuropsychological battery assessed cognitive abilities. Covariates included age at assessment, gender and alcohol use.

Findings: After correcting for multiple testing, a greater frequency and earlier onset of regular cannabis use were associated with poorer cognitive performance, specifically on tests of verbal memory. Further, after accounting for familial factors shared by siblings and alcohol use, poorer verbal memory performance was still associated with greater life-time frequency of cannabis use at wave 1 [b = -0.007 (-0.002, -0.012), adjusted P = 0.036]; earlier cannabis use at wave 2 [b = -0.12 (-0.05, -0.19), adjusted P = 0.006; b = -0.14 (-0.06, -0.23), adjusted P = 0.006]; and greater frequency of past 6 months use at wave 2 [b = -0.02 (-0.01, -0.03), adjusted P = 0.002; b = -0.02 (-0.01, -0.03), adjusted P = 0.008].

Conclusions: Moderate adolescent cannabis use may have adverse effects on cognitive functioning, specifically verbal memory, that cannot be explained by familial factors.

Keywords: Adolescents; cannabis; cognitive; family; marijuana; sibling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of Interest: None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The sibling difference in delayed verbal memory, based on sibling differences in (A) age of onset of monthly use and (B) frequency of use in the past six months. Error bars represent standard errors around the point estimate. For age of onset (A), using cannabis two or more years earlier than one’s sibling was associated with a 0.40 standard-deviation decrease in delayed verbal memory performance, relative to the mean performance of participants from the same family (i.e., after accounting for familial factors shared by siblings).For frequency of use (B), using cannabis two or more days per week than one’s sibling was associated with a 0.23 standard-deviation decrase in delayed veriabl memory performance, relative to the mean performance of participants from the same family (i.e., after accounting for familial factors).

References

    1. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Swain-Campbell N. Cannabis use and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence and young adulthood. Addiction. 2002;97(9):1123–1135. - PubMed
    1. Lynskey M, Hall W. The effects of adolescent cannabis use on educational attainment: A review. Addiction. 2000;95(11):1621–1630. - PubMed
    1. Meier MH, Caspi A, Ambler A, et al. Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(40):E2657–E2664. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackson NJ, Isen JD, Khoddam R, et al. Impact of adolescent marijuana use on intelligence: Results from two longitudinal twin studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(5):E500–E508. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meier MH, Caspi A, Danese A, et al. Associations between adolescent cannabis use and neuropsychological decline: A longitudinal co-twin control study. Addiction. Published online 2017. doi:10.1111/add.13946 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types