Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 3;16(9):e1008758.
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008758. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Possibility for reverse zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to free-ranging wildlife: A case study of bats

Affiliations
Review

Possibility for reverse zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to free-ranging wildlife: A case study of bats

Kevin J Olival et al. PLoS Pathog. .

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the substantial public health, economic, and societal consequences of virus spillover from a wildlife reservoir. Widespread human transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) also presents a new set of challenges when considering viral spillover from people to naïve wildlife and other animal populations. The establishment of new wildlife reservoirs for SARS-CoV-2 would further complicate public health control measures and could lead to wildlife health and conservation impacts. Given the likely bat origin of SARS-CoV-2 and related beta-coronaviruses (β-CoVs), free-ranging bats are a key group of concern for spillover from humans back to wildlife. Here, we review the diversity and natural host range of β-CoVs in bats and examine the risk of humans inadvertently infecting free-ranging bats with SARS-CoV-2. Our review of the global distribution and host range of β-CoV evolutionary lineages suggests that 40+ species of temperate-zone North American bats could be immunologically naïve and susceptible to infection by SARS-CoV-2. We highlight an urgent need to proactively connect the wellbeing of human and wildlife health during the current pandemic and to implement new tools to continue wildlife research while avoiding potentially severe health and conservation impacts of SARS-CoV-2 "spilling back" into free-ranging bat populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Global patterns of bats and associated β-CoVs.
(A) Red-shaded distributions of bat species in which SARS-related β-CoVs of the subgenus Sarbecovirus have been detected; (B) pink-shaded distributions of bat species known to host β-CoVs of the subgenus Hibecovirus; (C) brown-shaded distributions of bats in which β-CoVs of the Nobecovirus lineage have been detected; and (D) green-shaded distributions of bats known to host MERS-related β-CoVs of the subgenus Merbecovirus. Different colors and shade styles within each panel represent different families of bats. A data table that includes all known bat species associations for each β-CoVs subgenus and peer-reviewed citations is available at US Geological Survey data release https://doi.org/10.5066/P9U461PJ. Maps created using ArcMap (ESRI, Redlands, California, United States of America) and bat ranges derived from spatial data on terrestrial mammals from the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. January 2019 [version 6.2]. https://www.iucnredlist.org; Downloaded on 11 April 2020). β-CoV, beta-coronavirus; MERS, Middle East respiratory syndrome; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Old-World and New-World bats.
Overlapping species distribution outlines of bats in the globally distributed suborder Yangochiroptera (blue) and Old-World Yinpterochiroptera (yellow). Maps created using ArcMap (ESRI, Redlands, California, USA) and bat ranges derived from spatial data on terrestrial mammals from the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species, January 2019 [version 6.2]. https://www.iucnredlist.org; Downloaded on 11 April 2020.

References

    1. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt A. Anthropogenic environmental change and the emergence of infectious diseases in wildlife. Acta Trop. 2001;78(2):103–16. 10.1016/s0001-706x(00)00179-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Plowright RK, Parrish CR, McCallum H, Hudson PJ, Ko AI, Graham AL, et al. Pathways to zoonotic spillover. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(8):502–10. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.45 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen T, Murray KA, Zambrana-Torrelio C, Morse SS, Rondinini C, Di Marco M, et al. Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases. Nature Communications. 2016;8:1124 10.1038/s41467-017-00923-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman JL, et al. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008;451:990–3. 10.1038/nature06536 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Han BA, Kramer AM, Drake JM. Global patterns of zoonotic disease in mammals. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32(7):565–77. 10.1016/j.pt.2016.04.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types