Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Sep 1;17(17):6368.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176368.

Digital Training for Non-Specialist Health Workers to Deliver a Brief Psychological Treatment for Depression in Primary Care in India: Findings from a Randomized Pilot Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Digital Training for Non-Specialist Health Workers to Deliver a Brief Psychological Treatment for Depression in Primary Care in India: Findings from a Randomized Pilot Study

Shital S Muke et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Task sharing holds promise for scaling up depression care in countries such as India, yet requires training large numbers of non-specialist health workers. This pilot trial evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a digital program for training non-specialist health workers to deliver a brief psychological treatment for depression. Methods: Participants were non-specialist health workers recruited from primary care facilities in Sehore, a rural district in Madhya Pradesh, India. A three-arm randomized controlled trial design was used, comparing digital training alone (DGT) to digital training with remote support (DGT+), and conventional face-to-face training. The primary outcome was the feasibility and acceptability of digital training programs. Preliminary effectiveness was explored as changes in competency outcomes, assessed using a self-reported measure covering the specific knowledge and skills required to deliver the brief psychological treatment for depression. Outcomes were collected at pre-training and post-training. Results: Of 42 non-specialist health workers randomized to the training programs, 36 including 10 (72%) in face-to-face, 12 (86%) in DGT, and 14 (100%) in DGT+ arms started the training. Among these participants, 27 (64%) completed the training, with 8 (57%) in face-to-face, 8 (57%) in DGT, and 11 (79%) in DGT+. The addition of remote telephone support appeared to improve completion rates for DGT+ participants. The competency outcome improved across all groups, with no significant between-group differences. However, face-to-face and DGT+ participants showed greater improvement compared to DGT alone. There were numerous technical challenges with the digital training program such as poor connectivity, smartphone app not loading, and difficulty navigating the course content-issues that were further emphasized in follow-up focus group discussions with participants. Feedback and recommendations collected from participants informed further modifications and refinements to the training programs in preparation for a forthcoming large-scale effectiveness trial. Conclusions: This study adds to mounting efforts aimed at leveraging digital technology to increase the availability of evidence-based mental health services in primary care settings in low-resource settings.

Keywords: depression; digital technology; mental health; non-specialist health worker; pilot study; primary care; psychological treatment; task sharing; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram. DGT: Digital Training.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in competency assessment scores within each training program. Note: this Figure includes scores from the n = 11 in F2F, n = 12 in DGT, and n = 13 DGT+ participants who completed the post-training (endline) competency measure; though, some of these participants did not complete the training programs. F2F: Face-to-Face; DGT: Digital Training.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sagar R., Dandona R., Gururaj G., Dhaliwal R., Singh A., Ferrari A., Dua T., Ganguli A., Varghese M., Chakma J.K. The burden of mental disorders across the states of India: The Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2017. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:148–161. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30475-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arvind B.A., Gururaj G., Loganathan S., Amudhan S., Varghese M., Benegal V., Rao G.N., Kokane A.M., Chavan B., Dalal P. Prevalence and socioeconomic impact of depressive disorders in India: Multisite population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e027250. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027250. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pathare S., Brazinova A., Levav I. Care gap: A comprehensive measure to quantify unmet needs in mental health. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci. 2018;27:463–467. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000100. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel V., Xiao S., Chen H., Hanna F., Jotheeswaran A., Luo D., Parikh R., Sharma E., Usmani S., Yu Y. The magnitude of and health system responses to the mental health treatment gap in adults in India and China. Lancet. 2016;388:3074–3084. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00160-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kokane A., Pakhare A., Gururaj G., Varghese M., Benegal V., Rao G.N., Arvind B., Shukla M., Mitra A., Yadav K. Healthcare. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Basel, Switzerland: 2019. Mental Health Issues in Madhya Pradesh: Insights from National Mental Health Survey of India 2016. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types