Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 3:1:20.
doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00021-9. eCollection 2020.

Reporting health research translation and impact in the curriculum vitae: a survey

Affiliations

Reporting health research translation and impact in the curriculum vitae: a survey

L Boland et al. Implement Sci Commun. .

Abstract

Background: Increasingly, health researchers must demonstrate the impact and real-life applications of their research. We investigated how health researchers with expertise in knowledge translation report research translation activities and impact on their curriculum vitae (CV).

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of health researchers with expertise in knowledge translation as we anticipated best practices in CV reporting from this specialized group. Our survey asked participants about their reporting of research translation and impact activities on their CVs, intention to report, and barriers and facilitators to reporting such activities on their CVs. We calculated univariate descriptive statistics for all quantitative data. Linear regression models determined predictors of researchers' intention to report research translation and impact activities on their CVs. We analyzed open-ended qualitative responses using content analysis.

Results: One hundred and fifty-three health researchers responded to the survey (response rate = 29%). Most respondents were Canadian, were female, and had a doctoral degree. Eighty-two percent indicated they reported at least one research translation and/or impact indicator on their CVs. Of those, health researchers commonly reported the following: advisory/regulatory committee membership related to research program (83%), research translation award(s) (61%), and academic performance assessments (59%). Researchers least commonly indicated the following: citation metric scores (31%), summaries of impact (21%), and requests to use research materials and/or products (19%). Fewer than half of the health researchers intended to report knowledge translation (43%) and impact (33%) on their CVs. Strong beliefs about capabilities and consequences of reporting research translation and/or impact were significant predictors of intention. Main barriers were as follows: CV templates do not include research translation and impact activities, participants perceived employers do not value research translation and impact activities, and lack of metrics to evaluate research translation and impact. Ninety-six percent were unaware of a CV template formatted to include research translation and/or impact reporting.

Conclusions: Knowledge translation and impact indicators on the CV are inconsistently reported by our sample of health researchers. Modifiable barriers should be addressed to support more consistent reporting of such activities, including providing a CV template that includes research translation and impact as well as clear metrics to quantify them.

Keywords: Curriculum vitae; Health researchers; Impact; Reporting; Research activities; Research translation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests to disclose, except Alison Hutchinson is an Associate Editor for Implementation Science and was not involved in handling the peer-review process.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gaughan M. Using the curriculum vitae for policy research: an evaluation of National Institutes of Health center and training support on career trajectories. Research Evaluation. 2009;18(2):117–124. doi: 10.3152/095820209X441781. - DOI
    1. Sandström U. Combining curriculum vitae and bibliometric analysis: mobility, gender and research performance. Research Evaluation. 2009;18(2):135–142. doi: 10.3152/095820209X441790. - DOI
    1. Gaughan M, Ponomariov B. Faculty publication productivity, collaboration, and grants velocity: using curricula vitae to compare center-affiliated and unaffiliated scientists. Research Evaluation. 2008;17(2):103–110. doi: 10.3152/095820208X287180. - DOI
    1. Cañibano C, Bozeman B. Curriculum vitae method in science policy and research evaluation: the state-of-the-art. Research Evaluation. 2009;18(2):86–94. doi: 10.3152/095820209X441754. - DOI
    1. Bozeman B, Dietz J, Gaughan M. Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation’ international journal of technology management. Int J Technol Manag. 2001;22(7/8):716–740. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2001.002988. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources