Reporting health research translation and impact in the curriculum vitae: a survey
- PMID: 32885181
- PMCID: PMC7427883
- DOI: 10.1186/s43058-020-00021-9
Reporting health research translation and impact in the curriculum vitae: a survey
Abstract
Background: Increasingly, health researchers must demonstrate the impact and real-life applications of their research. We investigated how health researchers with expertise in knowledge translation report research translation activities and impact on their curriculum vitae (CV).
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of health researchers with expertise in knowledge translation as we anticipated best practices in CV reporting from this specialized group. Our survey asked participants about their reporting of research translation and impact activities on their CVs, intention to report, and barriers and facilitators to reporting such activities on their CVs. We calculated univariate descriptive statistics for all quantitative data. Linear regression models determined predictors of researchers' intention to report research translation and impact activities on their CVs. We analyzed open-ended qualitative responses using content analysis.
Results: One hundred and fifty-three health researchers responded to the survey (response rate = 29%). Most respondents were Canadian, were female, and had a doctoral degree. Eighty-two percent indicated they reported at least one research translation and/or impact indicator on their CVs. Of those, health researchers commonly reported the following: advisory/regulatory committee membership related to research program (83%), research translation award(s) (61%), and academic performance assessments (59%). Researchers least commonly indicated the following: citation metric scores (31%), summaries of impact (21%), and requests to use research materials and/or products (19%). Fewer than half of the health researchers intended to report knowledge translation (43%) and impact (33%) on their CVs. Strong beliefs about capabilities and consequences of reporting research translation and/or impact were significant predictors of intention. Main barriers were as follows: CV templates do not include research translation and impact activities, participants perceived employers do not value research translation and impact activities, and lack of metrics to evaluate research translation and impact. Ninety-six percent were unaware of a CV template formatted to include research translation and/or impact reporting.
Conclusions: Knowledge translation and impact indicators on the CV are inconsistently reported by our sample of health researchers. Modifiable barriers should be addressed to support more consistent reporting of such activities, including providing a CV template that includes research translation and impact as well as clear metrics to quantify them.
Keywords: Curriculum vitae; Health researchers; Impact; Reporting; Research activities; Research translation.
© The Author(s) 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests to disclose, except Alison Hutchinson is an Associate Editor for Implementation Science and was not involved in handling the peer-review process.
Similar articles
-
Researchers' views on and practices of knowledge translation: an international survey of transfusion medicine researchers.Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jan 12;5(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00546-3. Implement Sci Commun. 2024. PMID: 38217052 Free PMC article.
-
Evolving partnerships: engagement methods in an established health services research team.Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 9;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00314-w. Res Involv Engagem. 2021. PMID: 34627403 Free PMC article.
-
How funding agencies can support research use in healthcare: an online province-wide survey to determine knowledge translation training needs.Implement Sci. 2014 Jun 6;9:71. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-71. Implement Sci. 2014. PMID: 24906229 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15200. Health Technol Assess. 2011. PMID: 21545758 Review.
-
The characteristics and reporting quality of research impact case studies: A systematic review.Eval Program Plann. 2019 Apr;73:10-23. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 11. Eval Program Plann. 2019. PMID: 30453183
Cited by
-
Metrics to evaluate implementation scientists in the USA: what matters most?Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jul 16;3(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00323-0. Implement Sci Commun. 2022. PMID: 35842690 Free PMC article.
-
Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8461. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8461. Epub 2024 May 21. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024. PMID: 39099499 Free PMC article.
-
Use of the CPD-REACTION Questionnaire to Evaluate Continuing Professional Development Activities for Health Professionals: Systematic Review.JMIR Med Educ. 2022 May 2;8(2):e36948. doi: 10.2196/36948. JMIR Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 35318188 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A novel methodological approach to participant engagement and policy relevance for community-based primary medical care research during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia and New Zealand.Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jan 22;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01100-8. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024. PMID: 38254197 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gaughan M. Using the curriculum vitae for policy research: an evaluation of National Institutes of Health center and training support on career trajectories. Research Evaluation. 2009;18(2):117–124. doi: 10.3152/095820209X441781. - DOI
-
- Sandström U. Combining curriculum vitae and bibliometric analysis: mobility, gender and research performance. Research Evaluation. 2009;18(2):135–142. doi: 10.3152/095820209X441790. - DOI
-
- Gaughan M, Ponomariov B. Faculty publication productivity, collaboration, and grants velocity: using curricula vitae to compare center-affiliated and unaffiliated scientists. Research Evaluation. 2008;17(2):103–110. doi: 10.3152/095820208X287180. - DOI
-
- Cañibano C, Bozeman B. Curriculum vitae method in science policy and research evaluation: the state-of-the-art. Research Evaluation. 2009;18(2):86–94. doi: 10.3152/095820209X441754. - DOI
-
- Bozeman B, Dietz J, Gaughan M. Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation’ international journal of technology management. Int J Technol Manag. 2001;22(7/8):716–740. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2001.002988. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources