Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Oct;46(10):1884-1893.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06216-x. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

Effect of midodrine versus placebo on time to vasopressor discontinuation in patients with persistent hypotension in the intensive care unit (MIDAS): an international randomised clinical trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of midodrine versus placebo on time to vasopressor discontinuation in patients with persistent hypotension in the intensive care unit (MIDAS): an international randomised clinical trial

Peter Santer et al. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: ICU discharge is often delayed by a requirement for intravenous vasopressor medications to maintain normotension. We hypothesised that the administration of midodrine, an oral α1-adrenergic agonist, as adjunct to standard treatment shortens the duration of intravenous vasopressor requirement.

Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, controlled trial including three tertiary referral hospitals in the US and Australia, we enrolled adult patients with hypotension requiring a single-agent intravenous vasopressor for ≥ 24 h. Subjects received oral midodrine (20 mg) or placebo every 8 h in addition to standard care until cessation of intravenous vasopressors, ICU discharge, or occurrence of adverse events. The primary outcome was time to vasopressor discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included time to ICU discharge readiness, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and ICU readmission rates.

Results: Between October 2012 and June 2019, 136 participants were randomised, of whom 132 received the allocated intervention and were included in the analysis (modified intention-to-treat approach). Time to vasopressor discontinuation was not different between midodrine and placebo groups (median [IQR], 23.5 [10-54] vs 22.5 [10.4-40] h; difference, 1 h; 95% CI - 10.4 to 12.3 h; p = 0.62). No differences in secondary endpoints were observed. Bradycardia occurred more often after midodrine administration (5 [7.6%] vs 0 [0%], p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Midodrine did not accelerate liberation from intravenous vasopressors and was not effective for the treatment of hypotension in critically ill patients.

Keywords: ICU discharge; Midodrine; Oral vasopressor; Persistent hypotension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: Matthias Eikermann has received unrestricted funds from philanthropic donors Jeffrey and Judy Buzen and grants from Merck & Co. outside of the submitted work. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Participant flow
ICU indicates intensive care unit, HDU indicates high dependency unit. aNumbers of participants not meeting inclusion or exclusion criteria are nonexclusive.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Post hoc time-to-event analysis for time to vasopressor discontinuation
Kaplan-Meier curves for time to vasopressor discontinuation showed no difference in time to vasopressor discontinuation between the midodrine (navy blue solid line) and placebo (light blue dashed line) groups.

Comment in

References

    1. Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Harrison AM, Carrera P, Srivali N, Kittamongkolchai W, Erdogan A, Kashani KB (2016) Temporal trends in the utilization of vasopressors in intensive care units: an epidemiologic study. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 17 (1):19. doi:10.1186/s40360-016-0063-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambden S, Creagh-Brown BC, Hunt J, Summers C, Forni LG (2018) Definitions and pathophysiology of vasoplegic shock. Crit Care 22 (1):174. doi:10.1186/s13054-018-2102-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhruva SS, Redberg RF (2010) Accelerated approval and possible withdrawal of midodrine. JAMA 304 (19):2172–2173. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1695 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mitka M (2012) Trials to address efficacy of midodrine 18 years after it gains FDA approval. JAMA 307 (11):1124, 1127. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.291 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith W, Wan H, Much D, Robinson AG, Martin P (2016) Clinical benefit of midodrine hydrochloride in symptomatic orthostatic hypotension: a phase 4, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, tilt-table study. Clin Auton Res 26 (4):269–277. doi:10.1007/s10286-016-0363-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types