Complications after osteosynthesis of craniofacial fractures-an analysis from the years 2015-2017
- PMID: 32885304
- DOI: 10.1007/s10006-020-00903-1
Complications after osteosynthesis of craniofacial fractures-an analysis from the years 2015-2017
Abstract
Background: Complications mean a recurring problem in everyday clinical practice. Complication rates between 6 and 13% are described for the treatment of bony injuries to the head and neck area. This paper aims to provide a detailed analysis of the complications after osteosynthesis in facial skull fractures.
Material and method: In this retrospective study, we reviewed all patient records of injured treated in the Department of Cranial and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Dortmund General Hospital between 2015 and 2017.
Results: Of the 22,031 head and neck injuries, 685 were treated with osteosynthesis. A clinically significant complication was reported in 32 patients (4.76%). The number of total complications was 63. In total, 66.7% of all complications have been identified in the paramedian mandible (44%), median mandible, mandibular angle, and in the collar area (each 12.7%). Eleven implants (in 5 patients) showed a cancellous bone impaction. Broken implants have been recognized in two cases. In 8 cases, there was a pseudarthrosis in the fracture area; in one case, there was a broken implant and pseudarthrosis in combination.
Conclusion: Osteosynthesis is a safe method of treating facial skull fractures, which is why we consider it the gold standard of therapy. The complication rate is well below 5%. The 3-dimensional adaptation (bending) and shortening of the osteosynthesis implants do not lead to an increase in complications.
Keywords: Bone fracture; Bone healing; Complication; Injury; Maxillofacial; Osteosynthesis.
References
-
- Luhr H-G (2000) Entwicklung der modernen Osteosynthese. Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 4(S1):S084–S090. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022964 - DOI
-
- Kolokythas A (2010) Long-term surgical complications in the oral cancer patient: a comprehensive review. Part I. JOMR 1(3). https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2010.1301
-
- Salgueiro MI, Stevens MR (2010) Experience with the use of prebent plates for the reconstruction of mandibular defects. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 3(4):201–208. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1268520 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Ylikontiola L, Sándor G, Serlo W, Salokorpi N (2012) Experience with craniosynostosis treatment using posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2(1):4. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.95307 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Hernandez RK, Do TP, Critchlow CW, Dent RE, Jick SS (2012) Patient-related risk factors for fracture-healing complications in the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database. Acta Orthop 83(6):653–660. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.747054 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources