Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;75(4):e13694.
doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13694. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

How to implement routine electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring in oncology rehabilitation

Affiliations

How to implement routine electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring in oncology rehabilitation

Lisa M Wintner et al. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Implemenation of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) like quality of life can add the patient's perspective to traditional clinical outcomes of cancer rehabilitation in a structured and standardized way.

Aim: To present useful steps for a successful implementation of routine electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) monitoring. The presented steps are exemplified by describing the procedure applied in an Austrian inpatient cancer rehabilitation centre.

Methods: The suggested implementation steps are presented based on the structure of the replicating effective programmes framework, which was used for developing a pragmatic implementation strategy.

Results: We scheduled alternating trainings and process evaluations for audit and enhancement of procedures. In this way, the ePRO participation rates could be improved. Stakeholder involvement led to initiatives that included the integration of ePRO data into the medical discharge letter and the implementation of follow-up assessments.

Discussion: Tailored changes in assessment procedures enabled the successful implementation of ePRO, which has been shown to be feasible before and after cancer rehabilitation. The continuous involvement of stakeholders paved the way for further projects initiated by medical staff as users themselves (inclusion of PRO data in the discharge letter and a comprehensive ePRO follow-up using a versatile online patient portal).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Components of the replicating effective programmes (REP) framework including actions taken for implementing ePRO
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Schematic diagram of the software functionalities used at the rehabilitation centre for ePRO assessment
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Flow‐chart of (e)PRO implementation at the rehabilitation centre
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Lessons learned: what would have contributed to the ePRO implementation?

References

    1. Statistik Austria . Prognosis of Cancer Incidence and Mortality. [Prognose der Krebsinzidenz und Krebsmortalität.]; 2016. http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/ges.... Accessed October 22, 2019.
    1. Statistik Austria . Surviving Cancer [Überleben mit Krebs.]; 2017. http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/ges.... Accessed October 22, 2019.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . Guidance for industry: patient‐reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:79. 10.1186/1477-7525-4-79 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basch E, Jia X, Heller G, et al. Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: relationships with clinical outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1624‐1632. 10.1093/jnci/djp386 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amtmann D, Cook KF, Johnson KL, et al. The PROMIS initiative: involvement of rehabilitation stakeholders in development and examples of applications in rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:S12‐S19. 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.025 - DOI - PMC - PubMed