Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;40(2):261-268.
doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04019-y. Epub 2020 Sep 4.

Antibody response and the clinical presentation of patients with COVID-19 in Croatia: the importance of a two-step testing approach

Affiliations

Antibody response and the clinical presentation of patients with COVID-19 in Croatia: the importance of a two-step testing approach

Oktavija Đaković Rode et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

According to anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroresponse in patients with COVID-19 from Croatia, we emphasised the issue of different serological tests and need for combining diagnostic methods for COVID-19 diagnosis. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG ELISA and IgM/IgG immunochromatographic assay (ICA) were used for testing 60 sera from 21 patients (6 with severe, 10 moderate, and 5 with mild disease). The main clinical, demographic, and haemato-biochemical data were analysed. The most common symptoms were cough (95.2%), fever (90.5%), and fatigue and shortness of breath (42.9%). Pulmonary opacities showed 76.2% of patients. Within the first 7 days of illness, seropositivity for ELISA IgA and IgG was 42.9% and 7.1%, and for ICA IgM and IgG 25% and 10.7%, respectively. From day 8 after onset, ELISA IgA and IgG seropositivity was 90.6% and 68.8%, and for ICA IgM and IgG 84.4% and 75%, respectively. In general, sensitivity for ELISA IgA and IgG was 68.3% and 40%, and for ICA IgM and IgG 56.7% and 45.0%, respectively. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody distributions by each method were statistically different (ICA IgM vs. IgG, p = 0.016; ELISA IgG vs. IgA, p < 0.001). Antibody response in COVID-19 varies and depends on the time the serum is taken, on the severity of disease, and on the type of test used. IgM and IgA antibodies as early-stage disease markers are comparable, although they cannot replace each other. Simultaneous IgM/IgG/IgA anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing followed by the confirmation of positive findings with another test in a two-tier testing is recommended.

Keywords: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response; COVID-19 diagnostics; Clinical and laboratory findings; Croatia; Serological methods; Two-step testing approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA antibodies in 10 COVID-19 patients who had 3 or more follow-up sera drawn (Ab titre = antibody index serum/cutoff ratio; positive > 0.8)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Linear trends of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA (scatterplot a) and IgG (scatterplot b) ELISA antibody levels according to disease severity (positive titre > 0.8)

References

    1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395(10223):497–506 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H et al (2020) Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet [Internet] 395(10224):565–574 Available from: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. No Title [Internet]. Available from: https://www.hzjz.hr/priopcenja-mediji/koronavirus-najnoviji-podatci/
    1. Čivljak R, Markotić A, Capak K. Earthquake in the time of COVID-19: the story from Croatia (CroVID-20). JOGH [Internet]. 2020;10(1). Available from: 010349 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Čivljak R, Markotić A, Kuzman I. The third coronavirus epidemic in the third millennium: what’s next? Croat Med J. 2020;61(1):1–4. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed