Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 4:72:391-414.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-051920-013658. Epub 2020 Sep 4.

Socioeconomic Status and Intimate Relationships

Affiliations
Review

Socioeconomic Status and Intimate Relationships

Benjamin R Karney. Annu Rev Psychol. .

Abstract

The ways that couples form and manage their intimate relationships at higher and lower levels of socioeconomic status (SES) have been diverging steadily over the past several decades. At higher SES levels, couples postpone marriage and childbirth to invest in education and careers, but they eventually marry at high rates and have relatively low risk for divorce. At lower SES levels, couples are more likely to cohabit and give birth prior to marriage and less likely to marry at all. This review examines how SES comes to be associated with the formation, development, and dissolution of intimate relationships. Overall, research has highlighted how a couple's socioeconomic context facilitates some choices and constrains others, resulting in different capacities for relationship maintenance and different adaptive mating strategies for more and less advantaged couples. A generalizable relationship science requires research that acknowledges these differences and one that recruits, describes, and attends to socioeconomic diversity across couples.

Keywords: couples; intimate relationships; marriage; socioeconomic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams G (2005). The Cultural Grounding of Personal Relationship: Enemyship in North American and West African Worlds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 948–968. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.948 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amato PR, & Previti D (2003). People’s reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24(5), 602–626. doi:10.1177/0192513×03254507 - DOI
    1. Angrist J (2002). How Do Sex Ratios Affect Marriage and Labor Markets? Evidence from America’s Second Generation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 997–1038. doi:10.1162/003355302760193940 - DOI
    1. Arriaga XB (2001). The ups and downs of dating: fluctuations in satisfaction in newly formed romantic relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol, 80(5), 754–765. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11374747 - PubMed
    1. Baker EH (2014). Socioeconomic Status, Definition. In Cockerham WC, Dingwall R, & Quah S (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society (pp. 2210–2214). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.

Publication types