Cesarean section one hundred years 1920-2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
- PMID: 32887190
- DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0305
Cesarean section one hundred years 1920-2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Abstract
In present-day obstetrics, cesarean delivery occurs in one in three women in the United States, and in up to four of five women in some regions of the world. The history of cesarean section extends well over four centuries. Up until the end of the nineteenth century, the operation was avoided because of its high mortality rate. In 1926, the Munro Kerr low transverse uterine incision was introduced and became the standard method for the next 50 years. Since the 1970's, newer surgical techniques gradually became the most commonly used method today because of intraoperative and postpartum benefits. Concurrently, despite attempts to encourage vaginal birth after previous cesareans, the cesarean delivery rate increased steadily from 5 to 30-32% over the last 10 years, with a parallel increase in costs as well as short- and long-term maternal, neonatal and childhood complications. Attempts to reduce the rate of cesarean deliveries have been largely unsuccessful because of the perceived safety of the operation, short-term postpartum benefits, the legal climate and maternal request in the absence of indications. In the United States, as the cesarean delivery rate has increased, maternal mortality and morbidity have also risen steadily over the last three decades, disproportionately impacting black women as compared to other races. Extensive data on the prenatal diagnosis and management of cesarean-related abnormal placentation have improved outcomes of affected women. Fewer data are available however for the improvement of outcomes of cesarean-related gynecological conditions. In this review, the authors address the challenges and opportunities to research, educate and change health effects associated with cesarean delivery for all women.
Keywords: cesarean delivery; cesarean section; surgical technique; uterine closure; vaginal birth after cesarean.
References
-
- Hamilton, BE, Martin, JA, Osterman, MJ, Driscoll, AK., Rossen, LM. Vital statistics rapid release. Births: provisional data for 2017. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. p. 1–10, vol. 2020.
-
- Nakamura-Pereira, M, do Carmo Leal, M, Esteves-Pereira, AP, Domingues, RM, Torres, JA, Dias, MA, et al. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth. Reprod Health 2016;13:128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7.
-
- Rucker, MP, Rucker, EM. A librarian looks at cesarean section. Bull Hist Med 1951;25:132–48.
-
- Waszynski, E. Surgical technique for cesarean section of Eduardo Porro (1842–1902) and its significance for obstetric development. In the 150th anniversary year of the method’s creator. Ginekol Pol 1994;65:196–201.
-
- Hem, E, Bordahl, PE. Max Sanger – father of the modern caesarean section. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2003;55:127–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000071524.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials