Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Sep 4;10(9):91.
doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00357-4.

Elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in RRMM: final overall survival results from the phase 3 randomized ELOQUENT-2 study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in RRMM: final overall survival results from the phase 3 randomized ELOQUENT-2 study

Meletios A Dimopoulos et al. Blood Cancer J. .

Abstract

Prolonging overall survival (OS) remains an unmet need in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In ELOQUENT-2 (NCT01239797), elotuzumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (ERd) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) in patients with RRMM and 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LoTs). We report results from the pre-planned final OS analysis after a minimum follow-up of 70.6 months, the longest reported for an antibody-based triplet in RRMM. Overall, 646 patients with RRMM and 1-3 prior LoTs were randomized 1:1 to ERd or Rd. PFS and overall response rate were co-primary endpoints. OS was a key secondary endpoint, with the final analysis planned after 427 deaths. ERd demonstrated a statistically significant 8.7-month improvement in OS versus Rd (median, 48.3 vs 39.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.82 [95.4% Cl, 0.68-1.00]; P = 0.0408 [less than allotted α of 0.046]), which was consistently observed across key predefined subgroups. No additional safety signals with ERd at extended follow-up were reported. ERd is the first antibody-based triplet regimen shown to significantly prolong OS in patients with RRMM and 1-3 prior LoTs. The magnitude of OS benefit was greatest among patients with adverse prognostic factors, including older age, ISS stage III, IMWG high-risk disease, and 2-3 prior LoTs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.A.D.: Honoraria and consultancy: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda. S.L.: Consultancy: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Takeda. Research support: Celgene, Janssen, Takeda. D.W.: Honoraria, consultancy/advisory role: Amgen, Antengene, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda. P.M.: Advisory boards and honoraria: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda. K.W.: Honoraria: Amgen, Adaptive Biotech, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm, Novartis, Sanofi, Takeda. Research funding (institution): Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi. Advisory board fees: Amgen, Adaptive Biotech, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, Janssen, Juno, Sanofi, Takeda during the conduct of the study. J.S-M.: Advisory board: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda. O.S.: Consultancy/advisory role: Gilead, Millennium/Takeda. S.G.: Nothing to disclose. I.Š.: Honoraria: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Takeda. Consulting fees: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Sanofi, Takeda. Lecture fees: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Sanofi, Takeda. A.W-C.: Consultancy/advisory role: Janssen. H.M.: Nothing to disclose. M-V.M.: Honoraria/advisory boards: AbbVie, Adaptive Biotech, Amgen, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mundipharma EDO, Pharmamar, Takeda. A.B.: Nothing to disclose. D.R.: Research funding: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda. Consultancy: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm, Takeda. Honoraria: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda. Expert testimony at Health Canada: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen. Advisory board: Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm. M.B.: Speakers bureau: Celgene, Janssen. Advisory board: Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda. A.S.: Consultancy: AbbVie, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, Secura Bio, Servier, Specialized Therapeutics Australia. Speakers bureau: Celgene, Janssen, Takeda. Grant/research support: Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Servier, Takeda. Honoraria: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, Secura Bio, Servier, Specialized Therapeutics Australia, Takeda. H.O.: Conference sponsorship: Takeda. Advisory board/sponsorship: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Janssen, Novartis. M.T.: Honoraria: Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., Celgene. Research funding: Astellas, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD. R.Z.O.: Advisory boards with honoraria: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, FORMA Therapeutics, Ioni Pharmaceuticals, Legend Biotech, Millennium/Takeda, Molecular Partners, Onyx Pharmaceuticals/Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Takeda. Advisory boards without honoraria: Acetylon Pharmaceuticals. Grant/research funding: BioTheryX, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, Karus Pharmaceuticals, Millennium/Takeda, Onyx Pharmaceuticals/Amgen, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals C.R.: Honoraria, consultancy/advisory role: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, Daiichy Sankyo, Janssen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. Research funding: AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. H.E.: Grants: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, Janssen. Honoraria: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda. Advisory boards: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda. M.M.: Honoraria: Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K. K.L.W.: Consultancy/advisory role: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda. K.C.A.: Advisory boards: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Millennium, Sanofi-Aventis. A.G.: Employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Y-M.J.: Employment and stock: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. A.K.S.: Employee at time of study: AbbVie. P.G.R.: Research support: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, Oncopeptides, Takeda. Advisory boards: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Takeda.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Patient disposition.
One patient randomized to treatment with ERd received Rd. AE adverse event, ERd elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, Rd lenalidomide and dexamethasone.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Overall survival.
aUpper limit of the 95.4% CI is <1 when calculated to 3 decimal places: HR, 0.820; 95.4% CI, 0.676–0.995; P = 0.0408. CI confidence interval, ERd elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, HR hazard ratio, OS overall survival, Rd lenalidomide and dexamethasone.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Overall survival by predefined subgroups.
CI confidence interval, ERd elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, ISS International Staging System, Rd lenalidomide and dexamethasone.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Progression-free survival.
CI confidence interval, ERd elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, HR hazard ratio, PFS progression-free survival, Rd lenalidomide and dexamethasone.

References

    1. Howlader, N. et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2016. Bethesda, MD; 2019.
    1. Kumar SK, et al. Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: a multicenter international myeloma working group study. Leukemia. 2012;26:149–157. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.196. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar SK, et al. Natural history of relapsed myeloma, refractory to immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors: a multicenter IMWG study. Leukemia. 2017;31:2443–2448. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.138. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Usmani S, et al. Analysis of real-world data on overall survival in multiple myeloma patients with ≥3 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), or double refractory to a PI and an IMiD. Oncologist. 2016;21:1355–1361. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0104. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yong K, et al. Multiple myeloma: patient outcomes in real-world practice. Br. J. Haematol. 2016;175:252–264. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14213. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms