Nurse-led follow-up in survivorship care of gynaecological malignancies-A randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 32888339
- DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13325
Nurse-led follow-up in survivorship care of gynaecological malignancies-A randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To assess clinical and psychosocial outcomes of nurse-led follow-up in survivorship care of gynaecological malignancies.
Methods: Women with endometrial or ovarian cancer who were attending regular post-treatment follow-up at a tertiary referral centre were randomised into two groups-group-1: telephone follow-up by nurses and group-2: gynaecologists-led clinic follow-up. Women in group-1 were asked about their symptoms and quality of life (QoL) by nurses. Women in group-2 were followed up by gynaecologists and underwent symptom reviews and physical examinations. All ovarian cancer patients in both groups also had CA125 measured. All recruited women completed a QoL questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), HADS-anxiety questionnaire and symptom checklist.
Results: 385 women (215 with endometrial and 170 with ovarian cancer) were randomised. There was no significant difference in the detection of recurrence according to the two follow-up protocols. However, women in the nurse-led arm scored higher on emotional (p = 0.023) and cognitive functioning (p = 0.012). Those in the gynaecologist-led arm scored higher on the HADS-anxiety scale (p = 0.001) and were more likely to report symptoms.
Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a preliminary non-inferiority of nurse-led follow-up, with improved psychological morbidity and QoL. Thus, nurse-led follow-up can be considered an effective substitute for hospital-based care.
Keywords: endometrial cancer; follow-up; gynaecological cancer; ovarian cancer; quality of life; survivorship.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Beaver, K., Campbell, M., Williamson, S., Procter, D., Sheridan, J., Heath, J., & Susnerwala, S. (2012). An exploratory randomized controlled trial comparing telephone and hospital follow-up after treatment for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Disease, 14(10), 1201-1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02936.x
-
- Beaver, K., Hollingworth, W., McDonald, R., Dunn, G., Tysver-Robinson, D., Thomson, L., … Luker, K. (2009). Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial of hospital versus telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 96(12), 1406-1415. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6753
-
- Beaver, K., Tysver-Robinson, D., Campbell, M., Twomey, M., Williamson, S., Hindley, A., … Luker, K. (2009). Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: Randomised equivalence trial. BMJ, 338, a3147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3147
-
- Beaver, K., Williamson, S., Sutton, C., Hollingworth, W., Gardner, A., Allton, B., … Martin-Hirsch, P. (2017). Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up for patients treated for stage-I endometrial cancer (ENDCAT trial): A randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. BJOG, 124(1), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14000
-
- Cancer Research UK. Uterine cancer statistics. Retrieved Feb 2020, Retrieved from https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/s....
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
