Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2020 Sep-Oct;10(5):321-323.
doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.07.001.

Restructuring Our Approach to Peer Review: A Critical Need to Improve the Quality and Safety of Radiation Therapy

Affiliations
Editorial

Restructuring Our Approach to Peer Review: A Critical Need to Improve the Quality and Safety of Radiation Therapy

Bhishamjit S Chera et al. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020 Sep-Oct.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Marks L.B., Adams R.D., Pawlicki T. Enhancing the role of case-oriented peer review to improve quality and safety in radiation oncology: Executive summary. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013;3:149–156. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Talcott W.J., Lincoln H., Kelly J.R. A blinded, prospective study of error detection during physician chart rounds in radiation oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020;10:312–320. - PubMed
    1. Brunskill K., Nguyen T.K., Boldt R.G. Does peer review of radiation plans affect clinical care? A systematic review of the literature. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;97:27–34. - PubMed
    1. Ballo M.T., Chronowski G.M., Schlembach P.J., Bloom E.S., Arzu I.Y., Kuban D.A. Prospective peer review quality assurance for outpatient radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014;4:279–284. - PubMed
    1. Boxer M., Forstner D., Kneebone A. Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009;53:405–411. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources