Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug;44(5):151310.
doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151310. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

Contraceptive use among women with medical conditions: Factors that influence method choice

Affiliations
Review

Contraceptive use among women with medical conditions: Factors that influence method choice

Sheila K Mody et al. Semin Perinatol. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To identify factors that influence contraceptive initiation among women with medical conditions.

Study design: We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional survey of women 18-45 years old with medical conditions who received contraception consultation from complex family planning specialists at five University of California Medical Centers from June 2014-June 2015. We asked survey participants about factors that influence their decision of choosing and initiating a contraceptive method, how they accessed family planning specialists and the impact of this consultation on their contraceptive method choice.

Results: Among 97 participants, 61 (63%) had one medical condition, 28 (29%) had two medical conditions, and 8 (8%) had three or four medical conditions. A majority of participants initiated long-acting reversible contraceptive methods including an intrauterine device (n = 54, 56%) and the contraceptive implant (n = 17, 18%). The most common reason for initiating contraception was to avoid pregnancy in the immediate future for personal reasons (n = 43, 44%). The most common reason for initiating a particular contraceptive method was safety given their medical condition (n = 19, 20%). After the consultation with the complex family planning specialist, participants commonly reported that the person with the most influence on their contraceptive method choice was the complex family planning specialist (n = 35, 36%) and less commonly the primary care provider (n = 9, 9%) and not at all by a family member or friend (n = 0, 0%).

Conclusion: Women with medical conditions are highly influenced by a complex family planning specialist in regard to their contraceptive options and when receiving such counseling, will often choose highly effective methods.

Implications: This study provides insight into contraceptive decision-making among women with medical conditions referred to a complex family planning specialist for contraceptive care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02219269.

Keywords: Contraception; Family planning; Medical condition; Safety of pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.
    Paul R, Huysman BC, Maddipati R, Madden T. Paul R, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S884.e1-S884.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1266. Epub 2019 Dec 12. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31838124 Free PMC article.
  • Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
    Black A, Guilbert E; Co-Authors; Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman WV, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM; Special Contributors; Ferguson C, Fortin C, Kielly M, Mansouri S, Todd N; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Black A, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
  • Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
    Black A, Guilbert E; Co-Authors; Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman WV, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM; Special Contributors; Ferguson C, Fortin C, Kielly M, Mansouri S, Todd N. Black A, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26629725 English, French.
  • Motivational interviewing to promote long-acting reversible contraception among Rwandan couples wishing to prevent or delay pregnancy.
    Mukamuyango J, Ingabire R, Parker R, Nyombayire J, Easter SR, Wall KM, Tichacek A, Nyirazinyoye L, Kaslow N, Allen S, Karita E. Mukamuyango J, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S919.e1-S919.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1280. Epub 2019 Dec 12. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31838122 Free PMC article.
  • Evidence based contraceptive choices.
    Scott A, Glasier A. Scott A, et al. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Oct;20(5):665-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.03.002. Epub 2006 May 16. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006. PMID: 16707277 Review.

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data