Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep-Oct;24(5):422-427.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

Saliva is a reliable, non-invasive specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection

Affiliations

Saliva is a reliable, non-invasive specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection

Sara Nunes Vaz et al. Braz J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) of respiratory specimens is the gold standard test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection, collecting nasopharyngeal swabs causes discomfort to patients and may represent considerable risk for healthcare workers. The use of saliva as a diagnostic sample has several advantages.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to validate the use of saliva as a biological sample for diagnosis of COVID-19.

Methods: This study was conducted at Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory (LAPI), in Salvador, Brazil. Participants presenting with signs/symptoms suggesting SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) and/or oropharyngeal swab (OPS), and saliva collection. Saliva samples were diluted in PBS, followed by RNA isolation and RT-Real Time PCR for SARS-CoV-2. Results of conventional vs saliva samples testing were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS) version 18.0.

Results: One hundred fifty-five participants were recruited and samples pairs of NPS/OPS and saliva were collected. The sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR using saliva samples were 94.4% (95% CI 86.4-97.8) and 97.62% (95% CI 91.7-99.3), respectively. There was an overall high agreement (96.1%) between the two tests.

Conclusions: Use of self-collected saliva samples is an easy, convenient, and low-cost alternative to conventional NP swab-based molecular tests. These results may allow a broader use of molecular tests for management of COVID19 pandemic, especially in resources-limited settings.

Keywords: COVID-19; Diagnostics; SARS-CoV-2; saliva.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wu F., Zhao S., Yu B., et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020;579:265–269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng V.C.C., Lau S.K.P., Woo P.C.Y., Kwok Y.Y. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:660–694. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00023-07. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan J.F.W., Lau S.K.P., To K.K.W., Cheng V.C.C., Woo P.C.Y., Yue K.Y. Middle East Respiratory syndrome coronavirus: Another zoonotic betacoronavirus causing SARS-like disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28:465–522. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00102-14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available at: https://covid19.who.int/.
    1. Ministerio da saude. Painel Coronavirus. Available at: https://covid.saude.gov.br/.