Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 14;59(51):23010-23014.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202009625. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

Reaction Pathways and Redox States in α-Selective Cobalt-Catalyzed Hydroborations of Alkynes

Affiliations

Reaction Pathways and Redox States in α-Selective Cobalt-Catalyzed Hydroborations of Alkynes

Clemens K Blasius et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

Cobalt(II) alkyl complexes supported by a monoanionic NNN pincer ligand are pre-catalysts for the regioselective hydroboration of terminal alkynes, yielding the Markovnikov products with α:β-(E) ratios of up to 97:3. A cobalt(II) hydride and a cobalt(II) vinyl complex appear to determine the main reaction pathway. In a background reaction the highly reactive hydrido species specifically converts to a coordinatively unsaturated cobalt(I) complex which was found to re-enter the main catalytic cycle.

Keywords: T-shaped complex; alkenyl boronates; alkynes; cobalt; pincer ligand.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Left: Synthesis of cobalt(II) alkyl complexes 1. Right: Molecular structure of H,iPrboxmiCoCH2SiMe3 (1 b) in the solid‐state. Displacement ellipsoids set at 30 % probability level, hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity, only one of two independent molecules shown. Selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°], values for the second independent molecule are given in square brackets: Co–C23 1.963(7) [1.981(7)], Co–N1 1.905(6) [1.891(6)], Co–N2 1.963(6) [1.947(5)], Co–N3 1.929(6) [1.917(6)], N2‐Co‐C23 134.5(3) [130.7(3)], N1‐Co‐N3 153.5(2) [160.1(2)]. [30]
Figure 1
Figure 1
Conversion profile for a cobalt‐catalyzed hydroboration of 1‐ethinyl‐4‐fluorobenzene ([Alkyne]0/M=0.22, [HBPin]0/M=0.33, [Co]0/M 0.005, room temperature, toluene) monitored by in situ 19F NMR spectroscopy. Relative amounts in reaction mixture given.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Reaction of precatalyst H,RboxmiCoCH2SiMe3 (1) with stoichiometric amounts of pinacolborane as well as the internal alkyne 1‐phenyl‐1‐propyne yielding vinyl complex 4 (top), pinacolborane to generate the non‐isolable hydrido key intermediate (middle) as well as an excess of pinacolborane to give the dinuclear CoI complex 5 (bottom).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Molecular structures of H,iPrboxmiCoC(Me)C(H)Ph (4, left) and [H,iPrboxmiCo]2 (5, right). Displacement ellipsoids set at 30 % (4) and 50 % (5) probability level, hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity, only one of four independent molecules shown for 4. Selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°], given as range for all independent molecules in case of 4; 4: Co–C23 1.922(11)…1.956(11), Co–N1 1.921(7)…1.942(7), Co–N2 1.966(8)…1.994(8), Co–N3 1.916(7)…1.934(7); N2‐Co‐C23 162.6(4)…167.3(4), N1‐Co‐N3 171.5(4)…174.8(4). 5: Co1–center(C26‐C27) 2.029(2), Co2–center(C12‐C13) 2.047(2), Co1–N1 2.002(3), Co1–N2 1.976(3), Co1–N3 2.029(3), Co2–N4 2.062(3), Co2–N5 1.987(3), Co2–N6 2.009(3), C12–C13 1.412(4), C26–C27 1.420(4); N2‐Co1‐center(C26‐C27) 104.6(1), N1‐Co1‐N3 133.84(12), N5‐Co2‐center(C12‐C13) 106.0(1), N4‐Co2‐N6 139.60(12). [30]
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Mechanistic control experiments. In all schematic illustrations, [Co] denotes the complex fragment H,RboxmiCo; a) product distribution given; b) product distribution with respect to α3 b given; c) NMR yield given.
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
Proposed mechanistic cycle for the cobalt‐catalyzed hydroboration of alkynes.
Scheme 5
Scheme 5
Top: Substrate scope of the cobalt‐catalyzed α‐selective hydroboration of terminal alkynes. Reaction conditions: 300 μmol alkyne, 600 μmol HBPin, 0.5 mol % 1 a. [a] α:β‐(E) ratio was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy before purification; estimated error: ±2 %. [b] Yield of enriched α‐product. [c] 1 mol % catalyst loading. [d] Yield of isomer mixture. Bottom: Formal synthesis of Bexarotene by cobalt‐catalyzed α‐selective hydroboration.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. None
    1. Obligacion J. V., Chirik P. J., Nat. Rev. Chem. 2018, 2, 15–34; - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fürstner A., ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 778–789. - PMC - PubMed
    1. None
    1. Mukherjee A., Milstein D., ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 11435–11469;

LinkOut - more resources