Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Aug:40:101210.
doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101210. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

The effectiveness of cupping therapy on chronic fatigue syndrome: A single-blind randomized controlled trial

Xiu-Dong Meng  1 , Hao-Ran Guo  2 , Qing-Ying Zhang  3 , Xin Li  4 , Yong Chen  5 , Mu-Yang Li  6 , Xue-Mao Zhuo  7 , Mei-Juan Wang  8 , Kai Shan  9 , Yi-Nan Gong  10 , Ning-Cen Li  11 , Bo Chen  12 , Ze-Lin Chen  13 , Yi Guo  14
Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

The effectiveness of cupping therapy on chronic fatigue syndrome: A single-blind randomized controlled trial

Xiu-Dong Meng et al. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2020 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Background: and purpose: We investigated the effectiveness of cupping therapy with three different pressures in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

Materials and methods: The participants were randomly assigned to three groups, as follows: cupping pressure of -0.02 mpa (n = 38), -0.03 mpa (n = 38), or -0.05 mpa (n = 36). Each group received cupping treatment that consisted of 10 sessions over 5 weeks (2 sessions per week). The primary outcomes were Fatigue Scale (FS-14) score and Fatigue Assessment Instrument (FAI) score after 5 and 10 sessions. The secondary outcomes were the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score, the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) score, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score.

Results: There were 91 participants who completed the trial. After five sessions of treatment, the primary outcome of FS-14 score decreased by 3.20 (2.19, 4.21) in the -0.02 mpa group, by 2.39 (1.51, 3.27) in the -0.03 mpa group, and by 3.40 (2.28, 4.52) in the -0.05 mpa group (P = 0.667). After 10 sessions of treatment, the outcome of FS-14 score decreased by 5.00 (3.79, 6.21) in the -0.02 mpa group, by 4.06 (3.07, 5.05) in the -0.03 mpa group, and by 4.77 (3.52, 5.94) in the -0.05 mpa group (P = 0.929). And, the results were statistically different between 5 sessions and 10 sessions of treatment (P < 0.01). However, there were no statistical differences in FAI, SAS, SDS, and PSQI scores between the three groups after 5 sessions and 10 sessions of treatment.

Conclusions: In conclusion, cupping therapy has significantly relieved fatigue symptoms and improved emotion and sleep condition of CFS patients, and 10 sessions of treatment had superior results compared with 5 sessions in each group. Moreover, in 5 sessions of treatment, cupping with high pressure showed better improvement in fatigue syndromes and sleep condition according to effective rates.

Trial registration: Chinese clinical trial registry (ChiCTR1800017590); Ethical approval number: ChiECRCT-20180085.

Keywords: Chronic fatigue syndrome; Cupping therapy; Regularity of effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types