Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 1;31(1):7-12.
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa098.

Costs and effects of conventional vision screening and photoscreening in the Dutch preventive child health care system

Affiliations

Costs and effects of conventional vision screening and photoscreening in the Dutch preventive child health care system

Catharina P B Van der Ploeg et al. Eur J Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Little is known about costs and effects of vision screening strategies to detect amblyopia. Aim of this study was to compare costs and effects of conventional (optotype) vision screening, photoscreening or a combination in children aged 3-6 years.

Methods: Population-based, cross-sectional study in preventive child health care in The Hague. Children aged 3 years (3y), 3 years and 9 months (3y9m) or 5-6 years (5/6y) received the conventional chart vision screening and a test with a photoscreener (Plusoptix S12C). Costs were based on test duration and additional costs for devices and diagnostic work-up.

Results: Two thousand, one hundred and forty-four children were included. The estimated costs per child screened were €17.44, €20.37 and €6.90 for conventional vision screening at 3y, 3y9m and 5/6y, respectively. For photoscreening, these estimates were €6.61, €7.52 and €9.40 and for photoscreening followed by vision screening if the result was unclear (combination) €9.32 (3y) and €9.33 (3y9m). The number of children detected with amblyopia by age were 9, 14 and 5 (conventional screening), 6, 13 and 3 (photoscreening) and 10 (3y) and 15 (3y9m) (combination), respectively. The estimated costs per child diagnosed with amblyopia were €1500, €1050 and €860 for conventional vision screening, €860, €420 and €1940 for photoscreening and €730 (3y) and €450 (3y9m) for the combination.

Conclusions: Combining photoscreening with vision screening seems promising to detect amblyopia in children aged 3y/3y9m, whereas conventional screening seems preferable at 5/6y. As the number of study children with amblyopia is small, further research on the effects of these screening alternatives in detecting children with amblyopia is recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean costs per child screened (in 2017 euro) by age group, split up by cost components (of performing the various tests, device costs and clinical consultation)

References

    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Vision screening for children 1 to 5 years of age: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation statement. Pediatrics 2011;127:340–6. - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Ophthalmology, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, American Association of Certified Orthoptists. Instrument-based pediatric vision screening policy statement. Pediatrics 2012;130:983–6. - PubMed
    1. Jonas DE, Amick HR, Wallace IF, et al.Vision screening in children aged 6 months to 5 years: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2017;318:845–58. - PubMed
    1. DeSantis D Amblyopia. Pediatr Clin North Am 2014;61:505–18. - PubMed
    1. Buckle M, Billington C, Shah P, Ferris JD. Treatment outcomes for amblyopia using PEDIG amblyopia protocols: a retrospective study of 877 cases. J AAPOS 2019;23:98.e1–4. - PubMed

Publication types