Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;122(8):1778-1784.
doi: 10.1002/jso.26200. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

Management of the positive sentinel lymph node in the post-MSLT-II era

Affiliations

Management of the positive sentinel lymph node in the post-MSLT-II era

Brooke C Bredbeck et al. J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background and objectives: The publication of MSLT-II shifted recommendations for management of sentinel lymph node biopsy positive (SLNB+) melanoma to favor active surveillance. We examined trends in immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following publication of MSLT-II.

Methods: Using a prospective melanoma database at a high-volume center, we identified a cohort of consecutive SLNB+ patients from July 2016 to April 2019. Patient and disease characteristics were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression to examine factors associated with CLND.

Results: Two hundred and thirty-five patients were included for analysis. CLND rates were 67%, 33%, and 26% for the year before, year after, and second-year following MSLT-II. Factors associated with undergoing CLND included primary located in the head and neck (59% vs 33%, P = .003 and odds ratio [OR], 5.22, P = .002) and higher sentinel node tumor burden (43% vs 10% for tumor burden ≥0.1 mm, P < .001 and OR, 8.64, P = .002).

Conclusions: Rates of CLND in SLNB+ melanoma decreased dramatically, albeit not uniformly, following MSLT-II. Factors that increased the likelihood of immediate CLND were primary tumor located in the head and neck and high sentinel node tumor burden. These groups were underrepresented in MSLT-II, suggesting that clinicians are wary of implementing active surveillance recommendations for patients perceived as higher risk.

Keywords: CLND; MSLT-II; SLNB; melanoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Quarterly trends in immediate completion lymph node dissection rates relative to the publication of MSLT-II. Immediate completion lymph node dissection rates by quarter (Q, or 3 month periods) in the two years following publication of MSLT-II, here labeled as peri MSLT-II and post MSLT-II. There was a steep and persistent decrease in rates of CLND 3 months after publication, marking an inflection point at Q2 in the peri MSLT-II period

References

    1. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program Cancer Stat Facts: Melanoma of the Skin. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2020.
    1. Gorantla VC, Kirkwood JM. State of melanoma: an historic overview of a field in transition. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2014;28(3): 415–435. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Akkooi AC, Nowecki ZI, Voit C, et al. Sentinel node tumor burden according to the Rotterdam criteria is the most important prognostic factor for survival in melanoma patients: a multicenter study in 388 patients with positive sentinel nodes. Ann Surg. 2008;248(6):949–955. - PubMed
    1. Ascierto PA, Borgognoni L, Botti G, et al. New paradigm for stage III melanoma: from surgery to adjuvant treatment. J Transl Med. 2019; 17(1):266. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leiter U, Stadler R, Mauch C, et al. Final analysis of DeCOG-SLT trial: no survival benefit for complete lymph node dissection in patients with melanoma with positive sentinel node. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(32): 3000–3008. - PubMed

MeSH terms