Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;9(21):8053-8061.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.3413. Epub 2020 Sep 7.

Prevalence and severity of long-term physical, emotional, and cognitive fatigue across 15 different cancer entities

Affiliations

Prevalence and severity of long-term physical, emotional, and cognitive fatigue across 15 different cancer entities

Martina E Schmidt et al. Cancer Med. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Fatigue prevalence and severity have been assessed in a variety of studies, yet, not in a standardized way, and predominantly in breast cancer patients. Systematic, comparative investigations across a broad range of cancer entities are lacking.

Methods: The FiX study systematically enrolled 2244 cancer patients across 15 entities approximately 2 years after diagnosis. Fatigue was assessed with the multidimensional EORTC QLQ-FA12 questionnaire. Physical, emotional, cognitive, and total fatigue were compared across entities and with normative values of the general population. Differences in patients' characteristics and cancer therapy between entities were taken into account using analyses of covariance models.

Results: Across all entities, mean physical fatigue levels were significantly higher than age- and sex-matched means of the general population for all cancer entities (all Bonferroni-Holm adjusted P < .01). For most entities also emotional and cognitive fatigue levels were significantly higher than normative values. Age- and sex-standardized physical fatigue prevalence ranged from 31.8% among prostate to 51.7% among liver cancer patients. Differences between entities could not be fully explained by sex, age, BMI, or cancer therapy. Adjusted for these factors, mean physical fatigue was higher for stomach (P = .0004), lung (P = .034), kidney (P = .0011), pancreas (P = .081), and endometrium (P = .022) compared to breast cancer patients. Adjusted means of emotional fatigue were also lowest in breast cancer patients and significantly higher in stomach (P = .0047), bladder (P = .0036), and rectal (P = .0020) cancer patients.

Conclusions: Physical, emotional, and cognitive fatigue is prevalent in all 15 investigated cancer entities even 2 years after diagnosis. Fatigue in breast cancer patients, the so-far most studied group, is in the lowest range among all entities, suggesting that the extent of fatigue is still insufficiently determined. Entity-specific problems might need to be considered in the treatment of fatigue.

Keywords: breast cancer; cancer survivorship; cancer-related fatigue; gastrointestinal cancer; prevalence; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box‐Whisker plots of raw physical, emotional, cognitive, and total fatigue scores. Boxes represents 25th to 75th percentiles with middle line in box at median, Whisker ends at 10th and 90th percentiles; red dots represent mean values. The median normative fatigue values of the German population of age 60+ years are presented by a blue line for males, and red line for females or both sexes, if median identical

References

    1. Hofman M, Ryan JL, Figueroa‐Moseley CD, Jean‐Pierre P, Morrow GR. Cancer‐related fatigue: the scale of the problem. Oncologist. 2007;12(Suppl 1):4‐10. - PubMed
    1. Schmidt ME, Chang‐Claude J, Vrieling A, Heinz J, Flesch‐Janys D, Steindorf K. Fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: temporal courses and long‐term pattern. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6(1):11‐19. - PubMed
    1. Bower JE. Cancer‐related fatigue–mechanisms, risk factors, and treatments. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. 2014;11(10):597‐609. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mustian KM, Alfano CM, Heckler C, et al. Comparison of pharmaceutical, psychological, and exercise treatments for cancer‐related fatigue: a meta‐analysis. JAMA Oncology. 2017;3(7):961‐968. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Network NCC . NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: cancer‐related fatigue, version 2.2018. 2018.

MeSH terms