Cardiovascular Toxicity Related to Cancer Treatment: A Pragmatic Approach to the American and European Cardio-Oncology Guidelines
- PMID: 32893704
- PMCID: PMC7727003
- DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018403
Cardiovascular Toxicity Related to Cancer Treatment: A Pragmatic Approach to the American and European Cardio-Oncology Guidelines
Abstract
The considerable progress made in the field of cancer treatment has led to a dramatic improvement in the prognosis of patients with cancer. However, toxicities resulting from these treatments represent a cost that can be harmful to short- and long-term outcomes. Adverse events affecting the cardiovascular system are one of the greatest challenges in the overall management of patients with cancer, as they can compromise the success of the optimal treatment against the tumor. Such adverse events are associated not only with older chemotherapy drugs such as anthracyclines but also with many targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Recognizing this concern, several American and European governing societies in oncology and cardiology have published guidelines on the cardiovascular monitoring of patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic cancer therapies, as well as on the management of cardiovascular toxicities. However, the low level of evidence supporting these guidelines has led to numerous discrepancies, leaving clinicians without a consensus strategy to apply. A cardio-oncology expert panel from the French Working Group of Cardio-Oncology has undertaken an ambitious effort to analyze and harmonize the most recent American and European guidelines to propose roadmaps and decision algorithms that would be easy for clinicians to use in their daily practice. In this statement, the experts addressed the cardiovascular monitoring strategies for the cancer drugs associated with the highest risk of cardiovascular toxicities, as well as the management of such toxicities.
Keywords: cancer; cardiotoxicity; cardio‐oncology; guidelines.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr Thuny received modest fees for lectures outside the submitted work from Novartis, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Roche, and Astra‐Zeneca. Dr Cautela received modest lecture fees outside the submitted work from Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, and Astra‐Zeneca. Dr Salem received modest fees for lectures outside the submitted work from Merck Sharp and Dohme, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, and Roche. Dr Cohen‐Solal received modest fees for lectures outside the submitted work from Novartis. Dr Barlesi received modest consultant fees outside the submitted work from Astra‐Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Boehringer–Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Oncology, F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd, Novartis, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, and Takeda. Dr Ederhy received modest consultant and lecture fees outside the submitted work from Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, EISAI, Astra‐Zeneca, and Janssen. Dr Mirabel received modest fees for lectures outside the submitted work from Astra‐Zeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Janssen. Dr Champiat reports outside the submitted work personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, and Roche, other from As part of Gustave Roussy Drug Development Department (DITEP): principal/subinvestigator of Clinical Trials for Abbvie, Adaptimmune, Aduro Biotech, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Argen‐X Bvba, Arno Therapeutics, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Astra Zeneca, Astra Zeneca Ab, Aveo, Bayer Healthcare Ag, Bbb Technologies Bv, Beigene, Bioalliance Pharma, Biontech Ag, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bristol‐Myers Squibb International Corporation, Ca, Celgene Corporation, Cephalon, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Clovis Oncology, Cullinan‐Apollo, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm S.A., Eisai, Eisai Limited, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Forma Tharapeutics, Gamamabs, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxosmithkline, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, H3 Biomedicine, Hoffmann La Roche Ag, Incyte Corporation, Innate Pharma, Institut De Recherche Pierre Fabre, Iris Servier, Janssen Cilag, Janssen Research Foundation, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Kirin Pharm. Dev., Lilly France, Loxo Oncology, Lytix Biopharma As, Medimmune, Menarini Ricerche, Merck Kgaa, Merck Sharp & Dohme Chibret, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Merus, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Molecular Partners Ag, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Novartis Pharma, Octimet Oncology Nv, Oncoethix, Oncomed, Oncopeptides, Onyx Therapeutics, Orion Pharma, Oryzon Genomics, Ose Pharma, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Philogen S.P.A., Pierre Fabre Medicament, Plexxikon, Rigontec Gmbh, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Sierra Oncology, Sotio A.S, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Pharma, Tesaro, Tioma Therapeutics, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals France, Xencor, Y's Therapeutics, grants from As part of Gustave Roussy Drug Development Department (DITEP): Research Grants from Astrazeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, non‐financial support from Astrazeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boringher Ingelheim, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Medimmune, Merck, NH TherAGuiX, Pfizer, Roche. Dr Charbonnier reports personal fees from Incyte, personal fees from Pfizer, other from Novartis, outside the submitted work.
Figures

Clinical consultation (including BP measurement).
ECG.
Blood glucose, lipid profile, and glomerular filtration rate calculation should be evaluated before initiation of anthracyclines and HER2 inhibitors. Recheck at least at 1 year, 2 years, and periodically thereafter for patients who received anthracyclines.
TTE including measurements of LVEF measurements (ideally 3‐dimensional but at least 2‐dimensional Simpson biplane method) and GLS. In the absence of GLS quantification of LV longitudinal function, use mitral annular displacement by M‐mode echocardiography and/or peak systolic velocity of the mitral annulus by pulsed‐wave DTI.
LV contrast agents could be potentially useful in 2‐dimensional echocardiography.
CMR is recommended if the quality of TTE is suboptimal.
Use the same imaging modality for monitoring.
Actively manage modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and diseases.
Encourage exercise on a regular basis and healthy dietary habits.

Clinical consultation (including BP measurement).
ECG.
Blood glucose, lipid profile, and glomerular filtration rate calculation should be evaluated before initiation of these drugs. Recheck at least every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for patients who received VEGFi, mTORi, and Bcr‐Abli.
TTE including measurements of LVEF measurements (ideally 3‐dimensional but at least 2‐dimensional Simpson biplane method) and GLS. In the absence of GLS quantification of LV longitudinal function, use mitral annular displacement by M‐mode echocardiography and/or peak systolic velocity of the mitral annulus by pulsed‐wave DTI.
LV contrast agents could be potentially useful in 2‐dimensional echocardiography.
CMR imaging is recommended if the quality of TTE is suboptimal.
Use the same imaging modality for monitoring.
Actively manage modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and diseases.
Encourage to exercise on a regular basis and healthy dietary habits.


Clinical consultation (including BP measurement).
ECG.
Blood glucose, lipid profile, glomerular filtration rate calculation.
TTE including measurements of LVEF measurements (ideally 3‐dimensional but at least 2‐dimensional Simpson biplane method) and GLS. In the absence of GLS quantification of LV longitudinal function, use mitral annular displacement by M‐mode echocardiography and/or peak systolic velocity of the mitral annulus by pulsed‐wave DTI.
LV contrast agents could be potentially useful in 2‐dimensional echocardiography.
CMR is recommended if the quality of TTE is suboptimal.
Use the same imaging modality for monitoring.
Actively manage modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and diseases.
Encourage to exercise on a regular basis and healthy dietary habits.

Clinical consultation (including BP measurement).
ECG.
Blood glucose, lipid profile, glomerular filtration rate calculation.
TTE including measurements of LVEF measurements (ideally 3‐dimensional but at least 2‐dimensional Simpson biplane method) and GLS. In the absence of GLS quantification of LV longitudinal function, use mitral annular displacement by M‐mode echocardiography and/or peak systolic velocity of the mitral annulus by pulsed‐wave DTI.
LV contrast agents could be potentially useful in 2‐dimensional echocardiography.
CMR is recommended if the quality of TTE is suboptimal.
Use the same imaging modality for monitoring.
Actively manage modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and diseases.
Encourage to exercise on a regular basis and healthy dietary habits.
References
-
- Lee L, Cheung WY, Atkinson E, Krzyzanowska MK. Impact of comorbidity on chemotherapy use and outcomes in solid tumors: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:106–117. - PubMed
-
- Coleman MP. Cancer survival: global surveillance will stimulate health policy and improve equity. Lancet. 2014;383:564–573. - PubMed
-
- Lancellotti P, Suter TM, López‐Fernández T, Galderisi M, Lyon AR, Van der Meer P, Cohen Solal A, Zamorano J‐L, Jerusalem G, Moonen M, et al. Cardio‐Oncology Services: rationale, organization, and implementation. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1756–1763. - PubMed
-
- Cautela J, Lalevée N, Ammar C, Ederhy S, Peyrol M, Debourdeau P, Serin D, Le Dolley Y, Michel N, Orabona M, et al. Management and research in cancer treatment‐related cardiovascular toxicity: challenges and perspectives. Int J Cardiol. 2016;224:366–375. - PubMed
-
- Lenihan DJ, Cardinale DM. Late cardiac effects of cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3657–3664. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources