Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 7;17(1):138.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00989-6.

Evaluation of the birth plan implementation: a parallel convergent mixed study

Affiliations

Evaluation of the birth plan implementation: a parallel convergent mixed study

Parivash Ahmadpour et al. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy, birth, and motherhood are among the most important events of every woman's life. Training and participation of mothers in the decision-making process of delivery play an essential role in physical as well as psychosocial preparation of the mother. The healthcare system can improve and enhance the level of care by involving the patient in their self-care process. The aim of the present study is to assess the implementation of the birth plan for the first time in Iran in Tabriz city.

Methods/design: The present study uses a mixed-method with a parallel convergence approach, including both quantitative and qualitative phases. The quantitative phase is a randomized controlled clinical trial performed on 106 pregnant women, 32-36 weeks of pregnancy, referring to Taleghani educational hospital in Tabriz city. The participants will be assigned into intervention and control groups using a randomized block method. A training session will be held about the items of the birth plan checklist at weeks 32-36 of gestation for the participants in the intervention group, whereby a mother-requested birth plan will be developed. It will then be implemented by the researcher after admitting them to the delivery ward. Also, those in the control group will receive routine care. During and after the delivery, the questionnaire of delivery information, neonatal information, and Delivery Fear Scale (DFS) will be completed. Also, a partogram will be completed for all participants by the researcher. The participants in both groups will be followed up until six weeks post-delivery, whereby the instruments of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ2.0), Edinburgh's Postpartum Depression Scale and PTSD Symptom Scale 1 (PSS-I) will be completed six weeks 4-6 weeks postpartum by the researcher through an interview with participants in Taleghani educational hospital. The general linear model and multivariate logistic regression model will be used while controlling the possible confounding variables. The qualitative phase will be performed to explore the women's perception of the effect of the birth plan on childbirth experience within 4-6 weeks postpartum. The sampling will be of a purposeful type on the women who would receive the birth plan and will continue until data saturation. In-depth, semi-structured individual interviews would be used for data collection. The data analysis will be done through content analysis with a conventional approach. The results of the quantitative and qualitative phases will be analyzed separately, and then combined in the interpretation stage.

Discussion: By investigating the effect of implementing the birth plan on the childbirth experience of women as well as other maternal and neonatal outcomes, an evidence-based insight can be offered using a culturally sensitive approach. The presentation of the results obtained from this study using the mixed method may be effective in improving the quality of care provided for women during labor.

Trial registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT): IRCT20120718010324N58. Date of registration: July 7, 2020. URL: https://en.irct.ir/user/trial/47007/view.

Keywords: Birth experience; Birth plan; Mixed-method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study visual diagram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lothian J. Birth plans: the good, the bad, and the future. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35(2):295–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00042.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aragon M, Chhoa E, Dayan R, Kluftinger A, Lohn Z, Buhler K. Perspectives of expectant women and health care providers on birth plans. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(11):979–985. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30785-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hildingsson I, Johansson M, Karlström A, Fenwick J. Factors associated with a positive birth experience: an exploration of swedish women's experiences. Int J Childbirth. 2013;3(3):153–164. doi: 10.1891/2156-5287.3.3.153. - DOI
    1. Bailey JM, Crane P, Nugent CE. Childbirth education and birth plans. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2008;35(3):497–509. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.04.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hollins Martin CJ. Birth planning for midwives and mothers. Br J Midwifery. 2008;16(9):583–587. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2008.16.9.30881. - DOI