Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 1;66(12):1531-1537.
doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa210.

Evaluation of Orthogonal Testing Algorithm for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies

Affiliations

Evaluation of Orthogonal Testing Algorithm for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies

Gang Xu et al. Clin Chem. .

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody testing is an important tool in assessment of pandemic progress, contact tracing, and identification of recovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. We evaluated an orthogonal testing algorithm (OTA) to improve test specificity in these use cases.

Methods: A two-step OTA was applied where individuals who initially tested positive were tested with a second test. The first-line test, detecting IgG antibodies to the viral nucleocapsid protein, was validated in 130 samples and the second-line test, detecting IgG antibodies to the viral spike protein in 148 samples. The OTA was evaluated in 4333 clinical patient specimens. The seropositivity rates relative to the SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity rates were evaluated from our entire patient population data (n = 5102).

Results: The first-line test resulted in a clinical sensitivity of 96.4% (95% CI; 82.3% to 99.4%), and specificity of 99.0% (95% CI; 94.7% to 99.8%), whereas the second-line test had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI; 87.1% to 100%) and specificity of 98.4% (95% CI; 94.2% to 99.5%). Using the OTA, 78/98 (80%) of initially positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG results were confirmed with a second-line test, while 11/42 (26%) of previously diagnosed COVID-19 patients had no detectable antibodies as long as 94 days post PCR diagnosis.

Conclusion: Our results show that an OTA can be used to identify patients who require further follow-up due to potential SARS CoV-2 IgG false positive results. In addition, serological testing may not be sufficiently sensitive to reliably detect prior COVID-19 infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Distribution of all initially positive (n = 98) Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG results (S/C > 1.4). Discordant samples (n = 20) were negative on MUSC ELISA, and Positive (n = 78) were positive on both tests.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Distribution of all MUSC results sent to RL for analysis: (A) all MUSC discordant results (n = 20) and (B) a subset of results positive by both MUSC tests (n = 20). All results are shown relative to Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG Index results (S/C > 1.4).

References

    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). EUA Authorized Serology Test Performance. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/emergency-situations-medical-devices... (Accessed August 2020).
    1. Infantino M, Damiani A, Gobbi FL, Grossi V, Lari B, Macchia D, et al.Serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 infectious disease: benefits, limitations and perspectives. Isr Med Assoc J 2020;22:203–10. - PubMed
    1. Li Z, Yi Y, Luo X, Xiong N, Liu Y, Li S, et al.Development and clinical application of a rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis. J Med Virol 2020;92:1518–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torres R, Rinder HM.. Double-edged spike: are SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests safe right now? Lab Med 2020;51:236–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whitman JD, Hiatt J, Mowery CT, Shy BR, Yu R, Yamamoto TN, et al. Test performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 serological assays. preprint at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.25.20074856v2 (2020). - DOI

MeSH terms

Substances