Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan;27(2):237-256.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15342. Epub 2020 Oct 11.

Can N2 O emissions offset the benefits from soil organic carbon storage?

Affiliations
Review

Can N2 O emissions offset the benefits from soil organic carbon storage?

Bertrand Guenet et al. Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

To respect the Paris agreement targeting a limitation of global warming below 2°C by 2100, and possibly below 1.5°C, drastic reductions of greenhouse gas emissions are mandatory but not sufficient. Large-scale deployment of other climate mitigation strategies is also necessary. Among these, increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks is an important lever because carbon in soils can be stored for long periods and land management options to achieve this already exist and have been widely tested. However, agricultural soils are also an important source of nitrous oxide (N2 O), a powerful greenhouse gas, and increasing SOC may influence N2 O emissions, likely causing an increase in many cases, thus tending to offset the climate change benefit from increased SOC storage. Here we review the main agricultural management options for increasing SOC stocks. We evaluate the amount of SOC that can be stored as well as resulting changes in N2 O emissions to better estimate the climate benefits of these management options. Based on quantitative data obtained from published meta-analyses and from our current level of understanding, we conclude that the climate mitigation induced by increased SOC storage is generally overestimated if associated N2 O emissions are not considered but, with the exception of reduced tillage, is never fully offset. Some options (e.g. biochar or non-pyrogenic C amendment application) may even decrease N2 O emissions.

Keywords: biochar; cover crops agroforestry; erosion; greenhouse gas emissions; land-based mitigation; organic amendment; soil organic carbon; tillage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Cheng, K., Yue, Q., Chadwick, D., Espenberg, M., … Smith, P. (2019). A critical review of the impacts of cover crops on nitrogen leaching, net greenhouse gas balance and crop productivity. Global Change Biology, 25(8), 2530-2543. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14644
    1. Abramoff, R., Xu, X., Hartman, M., O'Brien, S., Feng, W., Davidson, E., … Mayes, M. A. (2018). The Millennial model: In search of measurable pools and transformations for modeling soil carbon in the new century. Biogeochemistry, 137, 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0409-7
    1. Aguilera, E., Lassaletta, L., Gattinger, A., & Gimeno, B. S. (2013). Managing soil carbon for climate change mitigation and adaptation in Mediterranean cropping systems: A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 168, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.02.003
    1. Andrianarisoa, K. S., Dufour, L., Bienaimé, S., Zeller, B., & Dupraz, C. (2016). The introduction of hybrid walnut trees (Juglans nigra × regia cv. NG23) into cropland reduces soil mineral N content in autumn in southern France. Agroforestry Systems, 90, 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9845-3
    1. Angers, D. A., & Eriksen-Hamel, N. S. (2008). Full-inversion tillage and organic carbon distribution in soil profiles: A meta-analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 72, 1370-1374. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0342