Needs, priorities, and attitudes of individuals with spinal cord injury toward nerve stimulation devices for bladder and bowel function: a survey
- PMID: 32895475
- PMCID: PMC7642195
- DOI: 10.1038/s41393-020-00545-w
Needs, priorities, and attitudes of individuals with spinal cord injury toward nerve stimulation devices for bladder and bowel function: a survey
Abstract
Study design: Survey.
Objectives: To investigate the needs and priorities of people with spinal cord injury for managing neurogenic bladder and bowel function and to determine their willingness to adopt neuromodulation interventions for these functions.
Methods: Anonymous online survey. It was advertised by word-of-mouth by community influencers and social media, and by advertisement in newsletters of advocacy groups.
Results: Responses from 370 individuals (27% female, 73% male) were included. Bladder emptying without catheters was the top priority for restoring bladder function, and maintaining fecal continence was the top priority for restoring bowel function. The biggest concerns regarding external stimulation systems were wearing a device with wires connecting to electrodes on the skin and having to don and doff the system daily as needed. The biggest concerns for implanted systems were the chances of experiencing problems with the implant that required a revision surgery or surgical removal of the whole system. Respondents were willing to accept an external (61%) or implanted (41%) device to achieve improved bladder or bowel function.
Conclusions: Bladder and bowel dysfunction remain important unmet challenges for individuals living with SCI who answered our survey. These individuals are willing to accept some potential risks of nerve stimulation approaches given potential benefits. Additional consumer input is critical for guiding both research and translation to clinical use and personalized medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest
Dr. Karl Thor and Dr. Bruno Gallo Santacruz are co-authors and they work for Dignify Therapeutics Inc. and for Radiometer, respectively. These roles may present real or perceived conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004. October;21(10):1371–83. - PubMed
-
- French JS, Anderson-Erisman KD, Sutter M. What do spinal cord injury consumers want? A review of spinal cord injury consumer priorities and neuroprosthesis from the 2008 neural interfaces conference. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2010. July;13(3):229–31. - PubMed
-
- Bragge P, Piccenna L, Middleton JW, Williams S, Creasey G, Dunlop S, et al. Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part I: rapid review of SCI prioritisation literature. Spinal Cord. 2015. October;53(10):714–20. - PubMed
-
- Braaf S, Lennox A, Nunn A, Gabbe B. Social activity and relationship changes experienced by people with bowel and bladder dysfunction following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2017. July;55(7):679–86. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
