Comparison of outcomes of urgent-start and conventional-start peritoneal dialysis: a single-centre experience
- PMID: 32895864
- DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02630-8
Comparison of outcomes of urgent-start and conventional-start peritoneal dialysis: a single-centre experience
Abstract
Background: There has been a growing interest in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients with end-stage kidney disease to avoid central venous catheter use and its complications. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between urgent-start PD (defined as PD commencement within 2 weeks of PD catheter insertion) and conventional-start PD.
Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective cohort study of all incident PD patients at Singapore General Hospital between January 2017 and February 2018. The primary outcome was dialysate leak. Secondary outcomes included catheter malfunction, catheter readjustment, exit-site infection, peritonitis, technique and patient survival.
Results: A total of 187 incident PD patients were included. Of these, 66 (35%) initiated urgent-start PD. Dialysate leak was significantly higher in urgent-start PD compared with conventional-start PD groups (7.6% versus 0.8%; p = 0.02) whilst catheter malfunction (4.5% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.70) and catheter readjustment (1.5% vs. 2.5%; p = 1.00) were comparable between the two groups. Exit-site infection was comparable (IRR: 0.66 95% CI 0.25-1.74) whilst peritonitis was significantly higher in urgent-start PD compared with conventional-start PD (incidence risk ratio (IRR) 3.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-7.44). Time to first episode of peritonitis, particularly Gram-positive peritonitis was significantly shorter with urgent-start PD. Technique survival (hazards ratio (HR) 1.95, 95% CI 0.89-4.31) and patient survival (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.44-4.87) were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusion: Urgent-start PD was associated with higher risks of dialysate leak and peritonitis but comparable technique and patient survival compared to conventional-start PD.
Keywords: Infectious complications; Mechanical complications; Peritoneal dialysis; Technique survival; Urgent-start.
References
-
- Collins AJ, Foley RN, Herzog C, Chavers B, Gilbertson D, Herzog C et al (2013) US renal data system 2012 annual data report. Am J Kidney Dis. 61(1 Suppl 1):A7 (e1-476) - DOI
-
- Perl J, Wald R, McFarlane P, Bargman JM, Vonesh E, Na Y et al (2011) Hemodialysis vascular access modifies the association between dialysis modality and survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 22(6):1113–1121 - DOI
-
- Lorenzo V, Martn M, Rufino M, Hernandez D, Torres A, Ayus JC (2004) Predialysis nephrologic care and a functioning arteriovenous fistula at entry are associated with better survival in incident hemodialysis patients: an observational cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 43(6):999–1007 - DOI
-
- Buck J, Baker R, Cannaby A-M, Nicholson S, Peters J, Warwick G (2007) Why do patients known to renal services still undergo urgent dialysis initiation? A cross-sectional survey. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22(11):3240–3245 - DOI
-
- Blake PG, Quinn RR, Oliver MJ (2013) Peritoneal dialysis and the process of modality selection. Perit Dial Int 33(3):233–241 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
