Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jun;33(6):1567-1575.
doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01665-2. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

A double-blind randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of cognitive training delivered using two different methods in mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: preliminary report of benefits associated with the use of a computerized tool

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A double-blind randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of cognitive training delivered using two different methods in mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: preliminary report of benefits associated with the use of a computerized tool

Sara Bernini et al. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of computer-based cognitive training (CCT) remains controversial, especially in older adults with neurodegenerative diseases.

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of CCT in patients with Parkinson's disease and mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI).

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 53 patients were randomized to receive CCT delivered by means of CoRe software, traditional paper-and-pencil cognitive training (PCT), or an unstructured activity intervention (CG). In each group, the intervention lasted 3 consecutive weeks (4 individual face-to-face sessions/week). Neuropsychological assessment was administered at baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1). Outcome measures at T0 and T1 were compared within and between groups. The Montreal Overall Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was taken as the primary outcome measure.

Results: Unlike the PCT group and the CG, the patients receiving CCT showed significant medium/large effect size improvements in MoCA performance, global cognition, executive functions, and attention/processing speed. No baseline individual/demographic variables were associated with greater gains from the intervention, although a negative correlation with baseline MoCA performance was found.

Conclusion: CCT proved effective in PD-MCI patients when compared with traditional PCT. Further follow-up assessments are being conducted to verify the retention of the gains and the potential ability of the tool to delay conversion to PD-dementia. Trial registration number (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT04111640 (30th September 2019).

Keywords: Computer-based cognitive training; Mild cognitive impairment; Multi-domain stimulation; Neurodegenerative disease; Parkinson’s disease; Randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Keshavan MS, Vinogradov S, Rumsey J et al (2014) Cognitive training in mental disorders: update and future directions. Am J Psychiatry 171:510–522. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13081075 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Nousia A, Martzoukou M, Tsouris Z (2020) The beneficial effects of computer-based cognitive training in parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 00:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acz080 - DOI
    1. Jean L, Bergeron M-E, Thivierge S et al (2010) Cognitive intervention programs for individuals with mild cognitive impairment: systematic review of the literature. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 18:281–296. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181c37ce9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernini S, Alloni A, Panzarasa S et al (2019) A computer-based cognitive training in Mild cognitive impairment in parkinson’s disease. NeuroRehabilitation 44:555–567. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-192714 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coyle H, Traynor V, Solowij N (2015) Computerized and virtual reality cognitive training for individuals at high risk of cognitive decline: systematic review of the literature. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 23:335–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2014.04.009 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources