Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;90(1):27-44.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13336. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

The importance of individual-to-society feedbacks in animal ecology and evolution

Affiliations

The importance of individual-to-society feedbacks in animal ecology and evolution

Maurício Cantor et al. J Anim Ecol. 2021 Jan.

Erratum in

  • Corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Anim Ecol. 2021 Apr;90(4):1020. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13434. Epub 2021 Feb 21. J Anim Ecol. 2021. PMID: 33821482 No abstract available.

Abstract

The social decisions that individuals make-who to interact with and how frequently-give rise to social structure. The resulting social structure then determines how individuals interact with their surroundings-resources and risks, pathogens and predators, competitors and cooperators. However, despite intensive research on (a) how individuals make social decisions and (b) how social structure shapes social processes (e.g. cooperation, competition and conflict), there are still few studies linking these two perspectives. These perspectives represent two halves of a feedback loop: individual behaviour scales up to define the social environment, and this environment, in turn, feeds back by shaping the selective agents that drive individual behaviour. We first review well-established research areas that have captured both elements of this feedback loop-host-pathogen dynamics and cultural transmission. We then highlight areas where social structure is well studied but the two perspectives remain largely disconnected. Finally, we synthesise existing research on 14 distinct research topics to identify new prospects where the interplay between social structure and social processes are likely to be important but remain largely unexplored. Our review shows that the inherent links between individuals' traits, their social decisions, social structure and social evolution, warrant more consideration. By mapping the existing and missing connections among many research areas, our review highlights where explicitly considering social structure and the individual-to-society feedbacks can reveal new dimensions to old questions in ecology and evolution.

Keywords: coevolution; fitness; group-living; individual differences; social evolution; social networks; social structure; social transmission.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Adelman, J. S., Moyers, S. C., Farine, D. R., & Hawley, D. M. (2015). Feeder use predicts both acquisition and transmission of a contagious pathogen in a North American songbird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1815), 20151429. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1429
    1. Agrawal, A. F., Brodie III, E. D., & Wade, M. J. (2001). On indirect genetic effects in structured populations. The American Naturalist, 158, 308-323. https://doi.org/10.1086/321324
    1. Agren, J. A., Davies, N. G., & Foster, K. R. (2019). Enforcement is central to the evolution of cooperation. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3, 1018-1029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0907-1
    1. Alberts, S. C. (2019). Social influences on survival and reproduction: Insights from a long-term study of wild baboons. Journal of Animal Ecology, 88, 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12887
    1. Allen, B., Lippner, G., Chen, Y. T., Fotouhi, B., Momeni, N., Yau, S. T., & Nowak, M. A. (2017). Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure. Nature, 544, 227-230. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21723

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources