The importance of individual-to-society feedbacks in animal ecology and evolution
- PMID: 32895936
- DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13336
The importance of individual-to-society feedbacks in animal ecology and evolution
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum.J Anim Ecol. 2021 Apr;90(4):1020. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13434. Epub 2021 Feb 21. J Anim Ecol. 2021. PMID: 33821482 No abstract available.
Abstract
The social decisions that individuals make-who to interact with and how frequently-give rise to social structure. The resulting social structure then determines how individuals interact with their surroundings-resources and risks, pathogens and predators, competitors and cooperators. However, despite intensive research on (a) how individuals make social decisions and (b) how social structure shapes social processes (e.g. cooperation, competition and conflict), there are still few studies linking these two perspectives. These perspectives represent two halves of a feedback loop: individual behaviour scales up to define the social environment, and this environment, in turn, feeds back by shaping the selective agents that drive individual behaviour. We first review well-established research areas that have captured both elements of this feedback loop-host-pathogen dynamics and cultural transmission. We then highlight areas where social structure is well studied but the two perspectives remain largely disconnected. Finally, we synthesise existing research on 14 distinct research topics to identify new prospects where the interplay between social structure and social processes are likely to be important but remain largely unexplored. Our review shows that the inherent links between individuals' traits, their social decisions, social structure and social evolution, warrant more consideration. By mapping the existing and missing connections among many research areas, our review highlights where explicitly considering social structure and the individual-to-society feedbacks can reveal new dimensions to old questions in ecology and evolution.
Keywords: coevolution; fitness; group-living; individual differences; social evolution; social networks; social structure; social transmission.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adelman, J. S., Moyers, S. C., Farine, D. R., & Hawley, D. M. (2015). Feeder use predicts both acquisition and transmission of a contagious pathogen in a North American songbird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1815), 20151429. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1429
-
- Agrawal, A. F., Brodie III, E. D., & Wade, M. J. (2001). On indirect genetic effects in structured populations. The American Naturalist, 158, 308-323. https://doi.org/10.1086/321324
-
- Agren, J. A., Davies, N. G., & Foster, K. R. (2019). Enforcement is central to the evolution of cooperation. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3, 1018-1029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0907-1
-
- Alberts, S. C. (2019). Social influences on survival and reproduction: Insights from a long-term study of wild baboons. Journal of Animal Ecology, 88, 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12887
-
- Allen, B., Lippner, G., Chen, Y. T., Fotouhi, B., Momeni, N., Yau, S. T., & Nowak, M. A. (2017). Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure. Nature, 544, 227-230. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21723
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources