Subclinical hemorrhagic nonfunctionning pituitary adenoma: pituitary gland function status, endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery, and outcomes

Abstract

Objective: How do subclinical hemorrhages into nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) influence the hormonal status and surgical outcomes remains unclear, our study aim at evaluating its definite effects on pituitary gland function and surgical outcomes.

Methods: All 103 consecutive patients who underwent initial endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for NFPAs resection from June 2016 to June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed, depending on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), operative and pathological findings, patients were divided into the non-hemorrhagic NFPAs group and the subclinical hemorrhagic NFPAs group. A comparative analysis was conducted between these two groups to investigate the effects of subclinical hemorrhages in NFPAs on pituitary endocrine function and surgical outcomes.

Results: The incidence of subclinical hemorrhage on NFPAs was 22.3% (23/103), which was more frequently observed in larger adenomas (28.9 ± 9.6 mm vs 19.2 ± 9.2 mm, p = 0.001). The incidence of preoperative hypopituitarism was 69.6% (16/23) for subclinical hemorrhagic NFPAs group and 31% (25/80) for non-hemorrhagic NFPAs group (p = 0.001), a high incidence of hypopituitarism for subclinical hemorrhagic NFPAs finally was found to be owing to the large tumor rather than the intratumoral hemorrhage. All those NFPAs were resected via EEA with the technology of extra-pseduocapusual dissection in a standard elective fashion. Postoperatively, there were more than 75.6% of patients with preoperative hypopituitarism had at least one axis recovered, with hyperprolactinemia resolved in 91.7% of patients, 94.7% headaches and 90% visual symptoms resolved or improved after surgery, there was no significant difference between these two groups (p > 0.05), indicates there was no any surgical outcome difference between NFPAs with or without subclinical hemorrhage. A very low postoperative complication was achieved with new postoperative anterior pituitary failure occurred in 9.7% of patients and permanent diabetes insipidus (DI) occurred in 9.7% of patients, which advocated that EEA can be chosen as a safe surgical treatment for subclinical hemorrhagic NFPAs. Furthermore, with the technology of extra-pseduocapusual dissection, more than 87% subclinical hemorrhagic NFPAs had achieved gross total resection (GTR) with a low incidence of new postoperative hypopituitarism (14%).

Conclusion: Subclinical hemorrhage in NFPAs does not aggravate pituitary gland function. A surgical management strategy by EEA with the technology of extra-pseduocapusual dissection for the subclinical hemorrhagic NFPAs usually yields satisfactory endocrine and surgical outcomes, but it does not necessitate emergent tumor decompression.

Keywords: Nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma; endoscopic endonasal approach; pituitary insufficiency; subclinical hemorrhage.