Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Feb:222:328-339.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.047. Epub 2020 Sep 5.

Aqueous Cytokine Expression and Higher Order OCT Biomarkers: Assessment of the Anatomic-Biologic Bridge in the IMAGINE DME Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Aqueous Cytokine Expression and Higher Order OCT Biomarkers: Assessment of the Anatomic-Biologic Bridge in the IMAGINE DME Study

Joseph R Abraham et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To identify biomarkers for predicting response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in diabetic macular edema (DME) and evaluate any links between cytokine expression and optical coherence tomography (OCT) phenotype.

Design: The IMAGINE is a post hoc image analysis and cytokine expression assessment of the Efficacy & Safety Trial of Intravitreal Injections Combined With PRP for CSME Secondary to Diabetes Mellitus (DAVE) randomized clinical trial.

Methods: Subjects were categorized as anatomical responders or nonresponders, and within the responder group as rebounders and non-rebounders based on quantitative, longitudinal OCT criteria. Retinal layer and fluid features were extracted using an OCT machine-learning augmented segmentation platform. Responders were further sub-classified by rapidity of response. Aqueous concentrations of 54 cytokines were measured at multiple timepoints. Expression was compared between responder groups and correlated with OCT imaging biomarkers.

Results: Of the 24 eyes studied, 79% were anatomical responders with 38% super responders, 17% early responders, and 25% slow responders. Twenty-one percent were nonresponders. Super responders had increased baseline vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (880.0 pg/mL vs 245.4 pg/mL; P = .012) and decreased monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) (513.3 pg/mL vs 809.5 pg/mL; P = .0.042) concentrations compared with nonresponders. Interleukin-6 (-24.9 pg/mL vs 442.8 pg/mL; P = .032) concentrations increased among nonresponders during therapy. VEGF concentrations correlated with central subfield thickness (r = 0.49; P = .01). Panmacular retinal volume correlated with increased interleuckin-6 (r = 0.47; P = .02) and decreased MCP-1 (r = -0.45; P = .03). Matrix metallopeptidase-1 correlated with subretinal fluid volume (r = 0.50; P = .01).

Conclusions: OCT imaging biomarkers correlated with both intraocular cytokines and responsiveness to anti-VEGF therapy, which indicated a possible link to underlying pathways and their relevance to DME prognosis. Baseline concentrations of VEGF and MCP-1 are associated with anatomic response to anti-VEGF therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Selection of representative foveal B-scans from Responder categories with volumetric fluid segmentation off (first row) and on (second row) for each classification taken at months 0, 1, and 6 or 12. Color distinguishes intraretinal (blue) and subretinal (green) fluid.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Longitudinal mean VEGF concentrations across all eyes from baseline to month 12 of treatment showing a significant drop in VEGF concentrations after treatment initiation. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Representative optical coherence tomography foveal B-scans from high and low VEGF eyes without volumetric fluid segmentation (first column), with fluid segmentation (second column), and retinal thickness maps (third column) taken at baseline.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Box and whisker plots of baseline VEGF and MCP-1 concentrations by anatomical Responder category visualizing increased VEGF and decreased MCP-1 among anatomical Responders compared to Nonresponders.

References

    1. Das A, McGuire PG, Rangasamy S. Diabetic Macular Edema: Pathophysiology and Novel Therapeutic Targets. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(7):1375–1394. - PubMed
    1. Romero-Aroca P, Baget-Bernaldiz M, Pareja-Rios A, Lopez-Galvez M, Navarro-Gil R, Verges R. Diabetic Macular Edema Pathophysiology: Vasogenic versus Inflammatory. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:2156273. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong TY, Cheung CMG, Larsen M, Sharma S, Simó R. Diabetic retinopathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16012. - PubMed
    1. Brown DM, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Do DV, et al. Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 100-Week Results From the VISTA and VIVID Studies. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(10):2044–2052. - PubMed
    1. Heier JS, Korobelnik J-F, Brown DM, et al. Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 148-Week Results from the VISTA and VIVID Studies. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(11):2376–2385. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms