Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 1;77(11):1355-1365.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3075.

Outcomes of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Excessively High Initial Systolic Blood Pressure: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Review

Outcomes of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Excessively High Initial Systolic Blood Pressure: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Adnan I Qureshi et al. JAMA Neurol. .

Abstract

Importance: The safety and efficacy of intensive systolic blood pressure reduction in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who present with systolic blood pressure greater than 220 mm Hg appears to be unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the differential outcomes of intensive (goal, 110-139 mm Hg) vs standard (goal, 140-179 mm Hg) systolic blood pressure reduction in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and initial systolic blood pressure of 220 mm Hg or more vs less than 220 mm Hg.

Design, setting, and participants: This post hoc analysis of the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage-II trial was performed in November 2019 on data from the multicenter randomized clinical trial, which was conducted between May 2011 to September 2015. Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and initial systolic blood pressure of 180 mm Hg or more, randomized within 4.5 hours after symptom onset, were included.

Interventions: Intravenous nicardipine infusion titrated to goals.

Main outcomes and measures: Neurological deterioration and hematoma expansion within 24 hours and death or severe disability at 90 days, plus kidney adverse events and serious adverse events until day 7 or hospital discharge.

Results: A total of 8532 patients were screened, and 999 individuals (mean [SD] age, 62.0 [13.1] years; 620 men [62.0%]) underwent randomization and had an initial SBP value. Among 228 participants with initial systolic blood pressures of 220 mm Hg or more, the rate of neurological deterioration within 24 hours was higher in those who underwent intensive (vs standard) systolic blood pressure reduction (15.5% vs 6.8%; relative risk, 2.28 [95% CI, 1.03-5.07]; P = .04). The rate of death and severe disability (39.0% vs 38.4%; relative risk, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.73-1.78]; P = .92) was not significantly different between the 2 groups. There was a significantly higher rate of kidney adverse events in participants randomized to intensive systolic blood pressure reduction (13.6% vs 4.2%; relative risk, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.21-8.56]; P = .01), but no difference was observed in the rate of kidney serious adverse events.

Conclusions and relevance: The higher rate of neurological deterioration within 24 hours associated with intensive treatment in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and initial systolic blood pressure of 220 mm Hg or more, without any benefit in reducing hematoma expansion at 24 hours or death or severe disability at 90 days, warrants caution against generalization of recommendations for intensive systolic blood pressure reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Barsan reported grants from the National Institute of Neurological Disease and Stroke during the conduct of the study. Dr Hanley reported personal fees from BrainScope, Neurotrope, Op2Lysis, and Portola Pharmaceuticals and grants from the National Institutes of Health outside the submitted work. Dr Silbergleit reported grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Suarez reported serving as the chair of a data safety and monitoring board for the INTREPID study, which was funded by Bard; Dr Suarez received no compensation for his participation. Dr Toyoda reported personal fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer Yakuhin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Nippon Boehringer outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Flow Diagram
Data were missing for 1 patient in the standard treatment group. SBP indicates systolic blood pressure.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hemphill JC III, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, et al. ; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology . Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46(7):2032-2060. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000069 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson CS, Heeley E, Huang Y, et al. ; INTERACT2 Investigators . Rapid blood-pressure lowering in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(25):2355-2365. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1214609 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Qureshi AI, Palesch YY, Martin R, et al. . Interpretation and Implementation of Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trial (INTERACT II). J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2014;7(2):34-40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed N, Audebert H, Turc G, et al. . Consensus statements and recommendations from the ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update Conference, Stockholm 11-13 November 2018. Eur Stroke J. 2019;4(4):307-317. doi:10.1177/2396987319863606 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qureshi AI, Palesch YY. Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH) II: design, methods, and rationale. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(3):559-576. doi:10.1007/s12028-011-9538-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances