Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Feb;32(2):423-431.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04487-y. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

A randomized comparison of training programs using a pelvic model designed to enhance pelvic floor examination in patients presenting with chronic pelvic pain

Maria Giroux  1 , Suzanne Funk  2 , Erwin Karreman  3 , Huse Kamencic  2 , Rashmi Bhargava  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized comparison of training programs using a pelvic model designed to enhance pelvic floor examination in patients presenting with chronic pelvic pain

Maria Giroux et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic floor myalgia is a common cause and contributor to chronic pelvic pain [Neurourol Urodyn 4:984-1008 (2017)]. The purpose of this study was to compare in-person versus video-based teaching methods of a comprehensive assessment of the pelvic floor musculature on a pelvic model.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial of 46 participants was conducted. The participants were randomized into two groups. Both groups were taught by the same pelvic floor physiotherapist using two different teaching methods on a pelvic model. Group 1 watched an instructional video, whereas group 2 had in-person training. Both groups underwent pre- and post-training assessments consisting of a written examination and an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Primary outcome measure was the change in participants' pre- and post-training assessment scores. Secondary outcome measures were perceived changes in both participants' comfort level in performing pelvic floor examination and applicability of the training program to clinical practice.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the teaching methods in the degree of improvement of the participants' mean written assessment scores (p = 0.58), OSCE scores (p = 0.15), and perceived comfort level (p = 0.19). Participants' mean pre- and post-assessment scores improved significantly (p < 0.001). Participants reported the training program to be applicable towards their clinical practice.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that learners' assessment of pelvic floor musculature can be enhanced using varied teaching methods on a pelvic model.

Keywords: Chronic pelvic pain; In-person teaching; Pelvic floor musculature; Pelvic model; Teaching methods; Video-based teaching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Format of the training session
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sample of the labeling exercise of pelvic floor musculature
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean written assessment scores before and after training in both groups (maximum score was 30)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Mean OSCE scores before and after training in both groups (maximum score was 30)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Doggweiler R, Whitmore KE, Meijink JM, Drake MJ, Frawley H, Nordling J, et al. A standard for terminology in chronic pelvic pain syndromes: a report from the chronic pelvic pain working group of the international continence society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;4:984–1008. doi: 10.1002/nau.23072. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kavvadias T, Baessler K, Schuessler B. Pelvic pain in urogynecology. Part 1: evaluation, definitions and diagnosis. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:385–393. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1218-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pastore EA, Katzman W. Recognizing myofascial pelvic pain in the female patient with chronic pelvic pain. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41(5):680–691. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01404.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fitzgerald CM, Neville CE, Mallinson T, Badillo SA, Hynes CK, Tu FF. Pelvic floor muscle examination in female chronic pelvic pain. J Reprod Med. 2011;56(3–4):117–122. - PubMed
    1. Spitznagle TM, Robinson CM. Myofascial pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2014;41(3):409–432. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2014.04.003. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types