Cost sharing, postpartum contraceptive use, and short interpregnancy interval rates among commercially insured women
- PMID: 32898503
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.109
Cost sharing, postpartum contraceptive use, and short interpregnancy interval rates among commercially insured women
Abstract
Background: Increasing access to effective birth control after childbirth may meet many women's preferences and reduce short interpregnancy interval rates. Eliminating out-of-pocket costs for contraception has been reported to increase the use of the most effective methods among women with employer-based insurance, but the prevalence and effects of patient cost sharing for contraception have not been studied during the postpartum period.
Objective: This study aimed to examine the association between cost sharing for long-acting reversible contraception and postpartum contraception use patterns and pregnancies in the 12 months after delivery.
Study design: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of commercially insured women undergoing childbirth from 2014 to 2018 using Optum's (Eden Prairie, MN) de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart database. This large national database includes nonretired employees and their dependents who are enrolled in health insurance plans sponsored by large- or medium-sized US-based employers. Women with 12 months of continuous enrollment postpartum were included. Childbirth, pregnancy, and contraceptive method (female sterilization, long-acting reversible contraceptives, other hormonal methods, and no prescription method observed) were identified using claims data. Contraceptive use patterns were observed at 3, 6, and 12 months postpartum and adjusted for individual and plan characteristics. Median out-of-pocket costs were $0 for sterilization and other hormonal methods but nonzero for long-acting reversible contraception. We therefore used simple and multivariable logistic regressions to examine the association between plan-level cost sharing (no cost sharing, $0; low cost sharing, >$0-<$200; and high cost sharing, ≥$200 out-of-pocket cost) for any long-acting reversible contraceptive insertion and contraceptive use patterns and short interpregnancy interval rates, controlling for age, household income, race and ethnicity, region, and insurance plan type.
Results: Among 25,298 plans with cost sharing data, we identified 172,941 women with continuous enrollment for 12 months postpartum, including 82,500 (47.7%) in no cost sharing, 22,595 (13.1%) in low cost sharing, and 67,846 (39.2%) in high cost sharing plans. The percentage of postpartum women in the study sample using any prescription contraceptive method was 39.5% by 3 months, 43.8% by 6 months, and 46.0% by 12 months. At all time points, postpartum women in no cost sharing plans had a higher predicted probability of long-acting reversible contraceptive use (eg, at 12 months: no cost sharing, 22.0%; low cost-sharing, 17.5%; high cost sharing, 18.3%; P<.001) and a lower predicted probability of no prescription method use (eg, at 12 months: no cost sharing, 51.8%; low cost sharing, 55.0%; high cost sharing, 54.9%; P<.001) than those in low or high cost sharing plans. Predicted probabilities of female sterilization and other hormonal method use did not differ substantively by plan cost sharing for long-acting reversible contraception at any time point. The proportion of women experiencing a short interpregnancy interval was low (1.9% by 3 months, 1.9% by 6 months, 2.0% by 12 months) and did not differ by plan cost sharing for long-acting reversible contraception at any time point.
Conclusion: Out-of-pocket costs for long-acting reversible contraception influence the method of contraception used by postpartum women with employer-based insurance. Eliminating financial barriers to long-acting reversible contraception access after childbirth may help women initiate their preferred method and increase the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives among interested women who otherwise might utilize less effective methods.
Keywords: Affordable Care Act; contraception use patterns; contraceptive access; financial barriers; long-acting reversible contraception; out-of-pocket costs; postpartum contraception; recurrent pregnancy.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Cost Sharing and Utilization of Postpartum Intrauterine Devices and Contraceptive Implants Among Commercially Insured Women.Womens Health Issues. 2019 Nov-Dec;29(6):465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Sep 5. Womens Health Issues. 2019. PMID: 31495642
-
Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):55.e1-55.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.036. Epub 2017 Feb 28. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28257962
-
The impact of cost sharing on women's use of annual examinations and effective contraception.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):93.e1-93.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.051. Epub 2018 May 9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29752935
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
-
Continuous quality improvement strategy for increasing immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive use at Jimma University Medical Center, Jimma, Ethiopia.BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Feb;12(1):e002051. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002051. BMJ Open Qual. 2023. PMID: 36796864 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Acceptability of ENG-releasing subdermal implants among postpartum Brazilian young women during the COVID-19 pandemic.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Jul;154(1):106-112. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13663. Epub 2021 Apr 29. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33656758 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring abortion in claims data: What is the state of the science?Contraception. 2025 Feb;142:110750. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110750. Epub 2024 Nov 15. Contraception. 2025. PMID: 39551368 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical