Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep;8(2):e000957.
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000957.

TIGIT in cancer immunotherapy

Affiliations
Review

TIGIT in cancer immunotherapy

Joe-Marc Chauvin et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Tumors evade immune-mediated recognition through multiple mechanisms of immune escape. On chronic tumor antigen exposure, T cells become dysfunctional/exhausted and upregulate various checkpoint inhibitory receptors (IRs) that limit T cells' survival and function. During the last decade, immunotherapies targeting IRs such as programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) and anticytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have provided ample evidence of clinical benefits in many solid tumors. Beyond CTLA-4 and PD-1, multiple other IRs are also targeted with immune checkpoint blockade in the clinic. Specifically, T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) is a promising new target for cancer immunotherapy. TIGIT is upregulated by immune cells, including activated T cells, natural killer cells, and regulatory T cells. TIGIT binds to two ligands, CD155 (PVR) and CD112 (PVRL2, nectin-2), that are expressed by tumor cells and antigen-presenting cells in the tumor microenvironment. There is now ample evidence that the TIGIT pathway regulates T cell-mediated and natural killer cell-mediated tumor recognition in vivo and in vitro. Dual PD-1/TIGIT blockade potently increases tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell expansion and function in vitro and promotes tumor rejection in mouse tumor models. These findings support development of ongoing clinical trials with dual PD-1/TIGIT blockade in patients with cancer.

Keywords: costimulatory and inhibitory T-cell receptors; immunotherapy; investigational; therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The TIGIT/CD226/CD96/CD112R axis. TIGIT, CD226, CD96, and CD112R are expressed on activated T cells and NK cells. TIGIT ligands CD115 and CD112 are expressed on APCs or tumor cells. TIGIT binds CD155 and CD112 as well as Fap2, a gut bacterium-derived protein. TIGIT, CD96, CD112R, and CD155 contain ITIM motifs in their cytoplasmic tail that trigger inhibitory signals. TIGIT also contains an ITT-like motif. CD226 associates with LFA-1 and binds CD155 to deliver a positive signal. CD96 binds CD155, and whether this triggers inhibitory or activating signals in human T cells remain to be determined. CD112R binds CD112 to deliver an inhibitory signal through its ITIM. APCs, antigen-presenting cells; ITIM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif; ITT, Ig tail-tyrosine; NK cells, natural killer cells; TIGIT, T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domain.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mechanisms of TIGIT inhibition of T cells in the TME. TIGIT displays multiple inhibitory mechanisms in T cells. 1: TIGIT binds CD155 and triggers direct inhibitory signals in T cells. 2: TIGIT binds CD155 on APCs to trigger IL-10 production and decrease IL-12 production, which indirectly inhibits T cells. 3: TIGIT binds CD155 with higher affinity than CD226 or disrupts CD226 homodimerization to impede CD226-mediated T cell activation. 4: TIGIT signaling in Tregs enhances their immunosuppressive functions. 5: Fap2 protein from the gut bacteria Fusobacterium nucleatum binds TIGIT to trigger inhibitory signals. APCs, antigen-presenting cells; IL, interleukin; ITIM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif; TIGIT, T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domain; Tregs, regulatory T cells.

References

    1. Zajac AJ, Blattman JN, Murali-Krishna K, et al. . Viral immune evasion due to persistence of activated T cells without effector function. J Exp Med 1998;188:2205–13. 10.1084/jem.188.12.2205 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blackburn SD, Shin H, Haining WN, et al. . Coregulation of CD8+ T cell exhaustion by multiple inhibitory receptors during chronic viral infection. Nat Immunol 2009;10:29–37. 10.1038/ni.1679 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK, et al. . Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2013;369:122–33. 10.1056/NEJMoa1302369 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zarour HM. Reversing T-cell dysfunction and exhaustion in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:1856–64. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1849 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, et al. . Five-Year survival and correlates among patients with advanced melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, or Non–Small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. JAMA Oncol 2019;5. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2187. [Epub ahead of print: 25 Jul 2019]. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances