Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;16(3):483-516.
doi: 10.1177/1745691620952789. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

The Future of Women in Psychological Science

Affiliations

The Future of Women in Psychological Science

June Gruber et al. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 May.

Abstract

There has been extensive discussion about gender gaps in representation and career advancement in the sciences. However, psychological science itself has yet to be the focus of discussion or systematic review, despite our field's investment in questions of equity, status, well-being, gender bias, and gender disparities. In the present article, we consider 10 topics relevant for women's career advancement in psychological science. We focus on issues that have been the subject of empirical study, discuss relevant evidence within and outside of psychological science, and draw on established psychological theory and social-science research to begin to chart a path forward. We hope that better understanding of these issues within the field will shed light on areas of existing gender gaps in the discipline and areas where positive change has happened, and spark conversation within our field about how to create lasting change to mitigate remaining gender differences in psychological science.

Keywords: bias; gender; gender roles; psychology; science; women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared that there were no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship or the publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Ten issues affecting the future of women in psychological science: Issues 1 to 3 involve examples of gender gaps facing women in psychological science. Issues 4 to 10 summarize possible systemic, interpersonal, or intrapersonal mechanisms that may help account for those disparities. This list is not intended to be exhaustive or to be a discussion of all of the relevant issues, or underlying mechanisms, affecting the future of women in psychological science.

References

    1. Abele A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abrami P. C., d’Apollonia S., Rosenfield S. (2007). The dimensionality of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. In Perry R. P., Smart J. C. (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 385–456). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
    1. Acker S. (2014). A foot in the revolving door? Women academics in lower-middle management. Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 73–85. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.864615 - DOI
    1. Acuna D. E., Allesina S., Kording K. P. (2012). Future impact: Predicting scientific success. Nature, 489, 201–202. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen T. D. (2006). Rewarding good citizens: The relationship between citizenship behavior, gender, and organizational rewards. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 120–143. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00006.x - DOI

Publication types