Shorter RSPV cryoapplications result in less phrenic nerve injury and similar 1-year freedom from atrial fibrillation
- PMID: 32901950
- DOI: 10.1111/pace.14062
Shorter RSPV cryoapplications result in less phrenic nerve injury and similar 1-year freedom from atrial fibrillation
Abstract
Background: In the 123-study, we prospectively assessed, in a randomized fashion, the minimal cryoballoon application time necessary to achieve pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) with the aim to reduce complications by shortening the application duration. The first results of this study demonstrated that shortened cryoballoon applications (<2 minutes) resulted in less phrenic nerve injury (PNI) without compromising acute isolation efficacy for the right PVs. We now report the 1-year follow-up results regarding safety and efficacy of shorter cryoballoon applications.
Methods: A total of 222 patients with AF were randomized to two applications of 1 min "short," 2 min "medium," or 3 min "long" duration, 74 per group. Recurrence of AF and PV reconduction at 1-year follow-up were assessed.
Results: The overall 1-year freedom from AF was 79% and did not differ significantly between the short, medium, and long application groups (77%, 74%, and 85% for short, medium, and long application groups, respectively; P = 0.07). In 30 patients, a redo PVI procedure was performed. For all four PVs, there was no significant difference in reconduction between the three groups. Reconduction was most common in the left superior PV (57%). The right superior PV (RSPV) showed significantly less reconduction (17%) compared to the other PVs.
Conclusions: Shortening cryoballoon applications of the RSPV to <2 minutes results in less PNI, while acute success and 1-year freedom from AF are not compromised. Therefore, shorter cryoballoon applications (especially) in the RSPV could be used to reduce PNI.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; cryoballoon; phrenic nerve injury; pulmonary vein isolation; safety.
© 2020 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):e275-e444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012.
-
- Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;50(5):e1-e88. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw313.
-
- Kuck K-HH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235-2245. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602014.
-
- Kuck K-HH, Albenque J-PP, Chun KRRJJ, et al. Repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation recurrence post cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in the FIRE and ICE trial. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2019;12:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007247.
-
- Tomaiko E, Tseng A, Su WW. Radiofrequency versus cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020;35:13-19. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000000700.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials