A qualitative evidence synthesis of healthcare professionals' experiences and views of palliative care for patients with a haematological malignancy
- PMID: 32902114
- PMCID: PMC7757223
- DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13316
A qualitative evidence synthesis of healthcare professionals' experiences and views of palliative care for patients with a haematological malignancy
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with haematological malignancies may not be receiving appropriate referrals to palliative care and continuing to have treatments in the end stages of their disease. This systematic review of qualitative research aimed to synthesise healthcare professionals' (HCPs) views and experiences of palliative care for adult patients with a haematologic malignancy.
Methods: A systematic search strategy was undertaken across eight databases. Thomas and Harden's approach to thematic analysis guided synthesis on the seventeen included studies. GRADE-GRADEQual guided assessment of confidence in the synthesised findings.
Results: Three analytic themes were identified: (a) "Maybe we can pull another 'rabbit out of the hat'," represents doctors' therapeutic optimism, (b) "To tell or not to tell?" explores doctors' decision-making around introducing palliative care, and (c) "Hospice, home or hospital?" describes HCPs concerns about challenges faced by haematology patients at end of life in terms of transfusion support and risk of catastrophic bleeds.
Conclusion: Haematologists value the importance of integrated palliative care but prefer the term "supportive care." Early integration of supportive care alongside active curative treatment should be the model of choice in haematology settings in order to achieve the best outcomes and improved quality of life.
Keywords: cancer; haematology; healthcare professional; palliative care; qualitative; qualitative evidence synthesis; review.
© 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
References
-
- Boland, A. , Cherry, M. G. , & Dickson, R. (2014). Doing a systematic review. A student’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
-
- Booth, A. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
-
- Booth, A. , Noyes, J. , Flemming, K. , Gerhardus, A. , Wahlster, P. , van der Wilt, G. J. , … Rehfuess, E. (2018). Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approaches. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 99, 41–52. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.03.003 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
