Soybean Embryonic Axis Transformation: Combining Biolistic and Agrobacterium-Mediated Protocols to Overcome Typical Complications of In Vitro Plant Regeneration
- PMID: 32903423
- PMCID: PMC7434976
- DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01228
Soybean Embryonic Axis Transformation: Combining Biolistic and Agrobacterium-Mediated Protocols to Overcome Typical Complications of In Vitro Plant Regeneration
Abstract
The first successful attempt to generate genetically modified plants expressing a transgene was preformed via T-DNA-based gene transfer employing Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation. Limitations over infectivity and in vitro tissue culture led to the development of other DNA delivery systems, such as the biolistic method. Herein, we developed a new one-step protocol for transgenic soybean recovery by combining the two different transformation methods. This protocol comprises the following steps: agrobacterial preparation, seed sterilization, soybean embryo excision, shoot-cell injury by tungsten-microparticle bombardment, A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation, embryo co-cultivation in vitro, and selection of transgenic plants. This protocol can be completed in approximately 30-40 weeks. The average efficiency of producing transgenic soybean germlines using this protocol was 9.84%, similar to other previously described protocols. However, we introduced a more cost-effective, more straightforward and shorter methodology for transgenic plant recovery, which allows co-cultivation and plant regeneration in a single step, decreasing the chances of contamination and making the manipulation easier. Finally, as a hallmark, our protocol does not generate plant chimeras, in contrast to traditional plant regeneration protocols applied in other Agrobacterium-mediated transformation methods. Therefore, this new approach of plant transformation is applicable for studies of gene function and the production of transgenic cultivars carrying different traits for precision-breeding programs.
Keywords: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation; Glycine max; embryonic axis; genetic transformation; high-efficiency plant transformation; particle bombardment.
Copyright © 2020 Paes de Melo, Lourenço-Tessutti, Morgante, Santos, Pinheiro, de Jesus Lins, Silva, Macedo, Fontes and Grossi-de-Sa.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Progress in Soybean Genetic Transformation Over the Last Decade.Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jun 9;13:900318. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.900318. eCollection 2022. Front Plant Sci. 2022. PMID: 35755694 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improved cotton transformation protocol mediated by Agrobacterium and biolistic combined-methods.Planta. 2021 Jul 3;254(2):20. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03666-5. Planta. 2021. PMID: 34216275
-
High-efficiency transformation by biolistics of soybean, common bean and cotton transgenic plants.Nat Protoc. 2008;3(3):410-8. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.9. Nat Protoc. 2008. PMID: 18323812
-
Agrobacterium- and Biolistic-Mediated Transformation of Maize B104 Inbred.Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1676:15-40. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7315-6_2. Methods Mol Biol. 2018. PMID: 28986902
-
[Research progress on system of transgene in soybean].Yi Chuan. 2004 Nov;26(6):969-76. Yi Chuan. 2004. PMID: 15640134 Review. Chinese.
Cited by
-
Stabilized Double-Stranded RNA Strategy Improves Cotton Resistance to CBW (Anthonomus grandis).Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 8;23(22):13713. doi: 10.3390/ijms232213713. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36430188 Free PMC article.
-
CRISPR/Cas genome editing in soybean: challenges and new insights to overcome existing bottlenecks.J Adv Res. 2025 Jul;73:53-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2024.08.024. Epub 2024 Aug 18. J Adv Res. 2025. PMID: 39163906 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An ex vitro hairy root system from petioles of detached soybean leaves for in planta screening of target genes and CRISPR strategies associated with nematode bioassays.Planta. 2023 Dec 18;259(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04286-x. Planta. 2023. PMID: 38108903
-
Aztreonam is a novel chemical inducer that promotes Agrobacteium transformation and lateral root development in soybean.Front Microbiol. 2023 Aug 24;14:1257270. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1257270. eCollection 2023. Front Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37692409 Free PMC article.
-
Progress in Soybean Genetic Transformation Over the Last Decade.Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jun 9;13:900318. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.900318. eCollection 2022. Front Plant Sci. 2022. PMID: 35755694 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bailey M. A., Boerma H. R., Parrott W. A. (1993). Genotype effects on proliferative embryogenesis and plant regeneration of soybean. Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 29, 102–108. 10.1007/BF02632279 - DOI
-
- Droste A., Pasquali G., Bodanese-Zanettini M. H. (2000). Integrated bombardment and Agrobacterium transformation system: An alternative method for soybean transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 18, 51–59. 10.1007/BF02825294 - DOI
-
- Dutta Gupta S. (2010). “Role of free radicals and antioxidants in in vitro morphogenesis,” in Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidants in Higher Plants, (USA: CRC Press and Sci. Pub.) 229–247.
-
- Gao X., Zhang Y., He Z., Fu X. (2017). “Gibberellins,” in Hormone Metabolism and Signaling in Plants (Cambrigde, USA: Elsevier; ), 107–160. 10.1016/B978-0-12-811562-6.00004-9 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources