Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 12:11:1589.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01589. eCollection 2020.

Relationship Between Personality Types in MBTI and Dream Structure Variables

Affiliations

Relationship Between Personality Types in MBTI and Dream Structure Variables

Chuanwen Zhao et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

This study aimed to explore relationships between personality type variables and dream structure variables. In the questionnaire experiment (N = 410), we investigated associations between different personality variables in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator questionnaire (MBTI) and various aspects of dreams in the Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE). The MBTI has four dimensions. In the Extroversion/Introversion (E/I) dimension, I types dreamt more of emotional intensity and passive emotions than E types. In addition, I types may become more distressed in nightmares than E types. E types more frequently shared their dreams with others. In the Sensation/Intuition (S/N) dimension, N types had a more positive attitude toward dreams and can get more novel ideas and help from their dreams than S types. In the dream diary experiment (N = 47), we investigated whether the S/N dimension may influence waking events' incorporation into dreams. External judges decoded paired waking events and dream reports. N types had more metaphorical incorporation than S types. More specifically, N types had more metaphorical expressions in their dreams than S types. This result may be due to the different characteristics between S types and N types. It may provide support for the dream continuity hypothesis.

Keywords: MADRE; MBTI; dream content; dream incorporation; dream metaphor; intuition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aumann C., Lahl O., Pietrowsky R. (2012). Relationship between dream structure, boundary structure and the big five personality dimensions. Dreaming 22:124 10.1037/a0028977 - DOI
    1. Baddeley A. (1992). “What is autobiographical memory?,” in Theoretical Perspectives on Autobiographical Memory, eds Wagenaar W. A., Rubin D., Spinnler H., Conway M. (Berlin: Springer Netherlands; ), 13–29. 10.1007/978-94-015-7967-4_2 - DOI
    1. Blagrove M., Fouquet N., Henleyeinion J. A., Paceschott E. F., Davies A. C., Neuschaffer J. L., et al. (2011a). Assessing the Dream-Lag Effect for REM and NREM Stage 2 Dreams. PLoS One 6:e26708. 10.1371/journal.pone.0026708 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blagrove M., Henley-Einion J., Barnett A., Edwards D., Seage C. H. (2011b). A replication of the 5-7 day dream-lag effect with comparison of dreams to future events as control for baseline matching. Conscious. Cogn. 20 384–391. 10.1016/j.concog.2010.07.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cai H. J., Zhu Z. W., Yang Z. L. (2001). The primary revision of MBTI in China. Chin. J. Appl. Psychol. 7 33–37.

LinkOut - more resources