Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 7:7:445.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00445. eCollection 2020.

Animal Welfare Assessment Protocol for Does, Bucks, and Kit Rabbits Reared for Production

Affiliations

Animal Welfare Assessment Protocol for Does, Bucks, and Kit Rabbits Reared for Production

Antoni Dalmau et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Rabbits are the third species in terms of number of animals reared for meat production in the world. However, in comparison to other species, very few studies have focused on their welfare. The aim of the present study is to implement an animal welfare-assessment protocol developed through a multidimensional approach and containing a number of animal-based measures for bucks, does, and kit rabbits. Thirty Spanish farms with conventional cages in the first year of integration in an animal welfare certification scheme were visited during 2019 and audited by the same auditor. The protocol is divided into four principles and 11 criteria. The Good Feeding principle includes eight parameters (one animal-based), Good Housing includes 15 parameters (six animal-based), Good Health includes 26 parameters (16 animal-based), and Appropriate Behavior contains nine parameters (four animal-based). In general, the main problems found were the absence of platforms, low space allowance and low height of the cage, inappropriate systems for performing emergency killing, insufficient protection of does from other adjacent does when housed individually, and absence of enrichment material. To a minor degree, but also found in an important number of farms, was a lack of temperature data records, high replacement rates of does, and lack of mortality-rate data records. However, in general, most of the farms obtained a good overall score, the maximum found being 73 out of 100 points. Nevertheless, none of the farms reached an excellent score, and four farms were scored below the 55 points required in the animal welfare certification scheme. The Good Feeding principle obtained the highest score, reaching excellent in all farms, and Appropriate Behavior the lowest one, with values ranging from 21 to 41 points out of 100. The results probably show how, for years, rabbit producers have been very focused on feeding needs and very little attention has been paid to behavioral needs.

Keywords: animal welfare; animal-based parameters; assessment protocol; behavior; health; housing; injuries; rabbits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Space allowance (cm2/doe or buck; with bars) and height (cm; black line) found in the 30 Spanish farms of bucks, does, and kit rabbits assessed during 2019.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of mortality (black part of the bar; %) and percentage of culling (gray part of the bar, %) registered during a period of 3 months in the 30 Spanish farms studied during 2019. The absence of a bar (black, gray, or both) means absence of data records for this farm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. FAOSTAT Food and Agriculture Data. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2020). Available online at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
    1. Broom DM. The scientific assessment of animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (1988) 20:5–19. 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90122-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fraser D, Ritchie JS, Fraser AF. The term ‘stress' in a veterinary context. Brit Veter J. (1975) 131:653–62. 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)35136-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simplicio JB, Cervera C, Blas E. Effect of two different diets and temperatures on the growth of meat rabbit. In: Proceedins of Fourth Congress World Rabbit Science Association (Budapest: ). (1988). p. 74–7.
    1. Paci G, Bagliacca M, Marzoni M, Liponi GB. Consumo giornaliero e CUDa di conigli sottoposti a differenti temperature. Ann Facol Med Vet Pisa. (1993) XLVI:377–85.

LinkOut - more resources