Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 7:11:2000.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02000. eCollection 2020.

How Reliably Can We Measure a Child's True IQ? Socio-Economic Status Can Explain Most of the Inter-Ethnic Differences in General Non-verbal Abilities

Affiliations

How Reliably Can We Measure a Child's True IQ? Socio-Economic Status Can Explain Most of the Inter-Ethnic Differences in General Non-verbal Abilities

Dacian Dolean et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Roma children have been discriminated against for many years as they are denied access to high-quality education based on their scores on general non-verbal IQ tests. Rushton et al. (2007) showed that Roma perform more poorly than non-Roma on one such test (i.e., Raven Progressive Matrices), but suggest that this underperformance could be explained by Roma's low socio-economic status. In this paper, we tested the non-verbal abilities of Roma children and expanded on the research of Rushton et al. (2007) by investigating empirically the potential mediating effects of socio-economic status on children's performance on Raven Progressive Matrices. Results showed that the performance of Roma children was, on average, significantly lower than the performance of their non-Roma peers; however, the effect of ethnicity was partially mediated by the parents' education and living conditions (while the parents' income had no significant effect). As hypothesized by Rushton et al. (2007) some socio-economic factors can explain important variability in the performance of Roma children on general non-verbal tests, and their poor performance on such tests may lead to an underestimation of the true population mean.

Keywords: Raven Progressive Matrices; Roma children; intelligence; segregation; socio-economic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Amnesty International and European Roma Rights Centre (2017). A Lesson In Discrimination: Segregation Of Romani Children In Primary Education In Slovakia. Brussels: Amnesty International and European Roma Rights Centre.
    1. Bakalar P. (2004). The IQ of gypsies in central Europe. Mankind Q. 44 291–300. 10.46469/mq.2004.44.3.3 - DOI
    1. Brewer M. B., Weber J. G. (1994). Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66:268. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.268 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brüggemann C. (2012). Roma Education in Comparative Perspective. Analysis of the UNDP/World Bank/EC Regional Roma Survey 2011. Roma Inclusion Working Papers. Bratislava: United Nations Development Programme.
    1. Cashman L. (2016). New label no progress: institutional racism and the persistent segregation of Romani students in the Czech Republic. Race Ethnic. Educ. 20 595–608. 10.1080/13613324.2016.1191698 - DOI