Polyp Detection Rate as a Surrogate for Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rates
- PMID: 32903839
- PMCID: PMC7445665
- DOI: 10.1159/000505622
Polyp Detection Rate as a Surrogate for Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rates
Abstract
Introduction: Quality measures for colonoscopy such as adenoma detection rate (ADR) have been proposed to be surveilled for ensuring minimum standards. However, its direct measurement is time consuming and often neglected. Extrapolating ADR and other quality measures from polyp detection rate (PDR) can be a pragmatic alternative.
Objective: To determine quotients for estimating ADR and sessile serrated adenoma/polyp detection rate (SSA/P-DR) from PDR in an Australian cohort.
Methods: Consecutive adult patient colonoscopies during a 1-year period were retrospectively assessed in a single Australian tertiary endoscopy center. Adenoma detection quotient (ADQ) and SSA/P detection quotient (SSA/P-DQ) were defined as the division of ADR and SSA/P-DR by PDR, respectively. The primary outcome was the number of procedures to achieve a stable cumulative ADQ and SSA/P-DQ. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of ADQ and SSA/P-DQ in different subsets.
Results: In total, 2,657 colonoscopies were performed by 15 endoscopists in 2016. The ADR, SSA/P-DR, and PDR found were 32.2, 6.7, and 47.3%, respectively. The ADQ and SSA/P-DQ values found were 0.68 and 0.14, respectively. After approximately 500 procedures, both ADQ and SSA/P-DQ became stable. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the prediction of ADR from ADQ was excellent for all endoscopists that performed >177 procedures in that year (ICC 0.84).
Conclusions: ADQ and SSA/P-DQ values were consistent when over 500 procedures were analyzed. ADQ had an excellent correlation with ADR when >177 procedures per endoscopist were evaluated.
Keywords: Colonic neoplasms; Colonic polyps; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Health metrics.
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effect of time of day and specialty on polyp detection rates in Australia.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;34(5):899-906. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14566. Epub 2019 Jan 8. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 30552716
-
Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1188-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 31. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017. PMID: 28153571 Free PMC article.
-
Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp detection rate of water exchange, Endocuff, and cap colonoscopy: A network meta-analysis.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec;36(12):3268-3277. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15702. Epub 2021 Oct 25. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 34622488
-
Endoscopic diagnosis of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with and without dysplasia/carcinoma.World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug 7;24(29):3250-3259. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i29.3250. World J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 30090005 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinicopathological features, diagnosis, and treatment of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with dysplasia/carcinoma.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct;34(10):1685-1695. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14752. Epub 2019 Jun 30. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 31158302 Review.
Cited by
-
Is There a Difference in Adenoma Detection Rates According to Indication? An Experience in a Panamanian Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.Gastroenterology Res. 2023 Apr;16(2):96-104. doi: 10.14740/gr1599. Epub 2023 Apr 28. Gastroenterology Res. 2023. PMID: 37187549 Free PMC article.
-
Overall Polyp Detection Rate as a Surrogate Measure for Screening Efficacy Independent of Histopathology: Evidence from National Endoscopy Database.Life (Basel). 2024 May 21;14(6):654. doi: 10.3390/life14060654. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38929637 Free PMC article.
-
Improved detection of adenomas and sessile serrated polyps is maintained with continuous audit of colonoscopy.BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul;7(1):e000425. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000425. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32675086 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study.Gut Liver. 2022 Sep 15;16(5):716-725. doi: 10.5009/gnl210287. Epub 2021 Dec 21. Gut Liver. 2022. PMID: 34933279 Free PMC article.
-
Real-time, computer-aided, detection-assisted colonoscopy eliminates differences in adenoma detection rate between trainee and experienced endoscopists.Endosc Int Open. 2022 May 13;10(5):E616-E621. doi: 10.1055/a-1783-9678. eCollection 2022 May. Endosc Int Open. 2022. PMID: 35571479 Free PMC article.
References
-
- AIHW . National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: monitoring report 2018. AIHW; 2018.
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68((6)):394–424. - PubMed
-
- Bettington M, Walker N, Clouston A, Brown I, Leggett B, Whitehall V. The serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma: current concepts and challenges. Histopathology. 2013 Feb;62((3)):367–86. - PubMed
-
- van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Verbeek AL, van Oijen MG, Laheij RJ, Fockens P, et al. Colorectal cancer screening comparing no screening, immunochemical and guaiac fecal occult blood tests: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Cancer. 2011 Apr;128((8)):1908–17. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials