Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 13;75(10):2207-2218.
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa159.

Psychological Well-Being Among Informal Caregivers in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging: Why the Location of Care Matters

Affiliations

Psychological Well-Being Among Informal Caregivers in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging: Why the Location of Care Matters

Yeonjung Lee et al. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. .

Abstract

Objectives: A caregiving stress perspective suggests that caregiving harms psychological well-being in informal caregivers, whereas a caregiving rewards perspective suggests that provision of care benefits psychological well-being. This research examines whether both perspectives apply to caregiving experiences, but differently by the primary location of caregiving (i.e., in-home, other residence, and institution), as well as by gender.

Methods: We analyzed depression and life satisfaction in the nationally representative Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (N = 48,648), first comparing noncaregivers (N = 27,699) to a combined caregiver group (N = 20,949) and then stratifying caregivers by the primary location of care.

Results: When considered as a single group, caregivers suffered relative to noncaregivers in terms of life satisfaction and depression. When stratified by the location of care, only in-home caregivers reported both greater depression and lower life satisfaction. Nonresidential caregivers did not differ significantly in levels of depression from noncaregivers and reported higher life satisfaction. Institutional caregivers reported greater depression than noncaregivers, but did not differ significantly in life satisfaction. These patterns were stronger among women than men.

Discussion: Both the caregiving stress and caregiving rewards perspectives are applicable to the caregiving experience, with the stress perspective more applicable to in-home caregivers and the rewards perspective more relevant to nonresidential caregivers. Recommendations include targeted practice focused on the location of care as well as the gender of the caregiver. Given that nonresidential caregivers actually benefit from providing care, interventions need to focus on identifying and bolstering positive aspects of the caregiving experience.

Keywords: CLSA; Depression; Life satisfaction; Positive aspects of caregiving; Stress process model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Location of care and symptoms of depression. (B) Location of care and life satisfaction.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Depression in noncaregivers and in-home caregiver—stratified by gender. (B) Life satisfaction in noncaregivers and in-home caregiver—stratified by gender.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andrén S, & Elmståhl S (2005). Family caregivers’ subjective experiences of satisfaction in dementia care: Aspects of burden, subjective health and sense of coherence. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19(2), 157–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00328.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andresen E M, Malmgren J A, Carter W B, & Patrick D L (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10(2), 77–84. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30622-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arai Y, Kumamoto K, Mizuno Y, & Washio M (2014). Depression among family caregivers of community-dwelling older people who used services under the Long Term Care Insurance program: A large-scale population-based study in Japan. Aging & Mental Health, 18(1), 81–91. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2013.787045 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ayalon L, & Green O (2015). Live-in versus live-out home care in Israel: Satisfaction with services and caregivers’ outcomes. The Gerontologist, 55(4), 628–642. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt122 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg-Weger M, Rubio D M, & Tebb S S (2000). Living with and caring for older family members: Issues related to caregiver well-being. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 33(2), 47–62. doi: 10.1300/j083v33n02_04 - DOI

Publication types