Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;49(1):79-87.
doi: 10.1177/1403494820956445. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

'Standing together - at a distance': Documenting changes in mental-health indicators in Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic

Affiliations

'Standing together - at a distance': Documenting changes in mental-health indicators in Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic

Amy Clotworthy et al. Scand J Public Health. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Aims: There is a need to document the mental-health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated societal lockdowns. We initiated a large mixed-methods data collection, focusing on crisis-specific worries and mental-health indicators during the lockdown in Denmark. Methods: The study incorporated five data sources, including quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews. The surveys included a time series of cross-sectional online questionnaires starting on 20 March 2020, in which 300 (3×100) Danish residents were drawn every three days from three population groups: the general population (N=1046), families with children (N=1032) and older people (N=1059). These data were analysed by trend analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 people aged 24-83 throughout Denmark to provide context to the survey results and to gain insight into people's experiences of the lockdown. Results: Absolute level of worries, quality of life and social isolation were relatively stable across all population groups during the lockdown, although there was a slight deterioration in older people's overall mental health. Many respondents were worried about their loved ones' health (74-76%) and the potential long-term economic consequences of the pandemic (61-66%). The qualitative interviews documented significant variation in people's experiences, suggesting that the lockdown's effect on everyday life had not been altogether negative. Conclusions: People in Denmark seem to have managed the lockdown without alarming changes in their mental health. However, it is important to continue investigating the effects of the pandemic and various public-health measures on mental health over time and across national contexts.

Keywords: COVID-19; Denmark; Mental health; citizen science; public health; quality of life; social isolation; worries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Timeline showing seminal events during the lockdown in Denmark in relation to how and when the project collected data between 27 February and 17 May 2020. The hospitalisation curve represents the total number of patients hospitalised at any given time, while the death curve represents the cumulative number of deaths due to COVID-19.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Crisis-specific worries within the general population (N=1046), families with children (N=1032) and older people (N=1059) based on data collected from 20 March to 16 April 2020.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Changes in mental-health indicators from 20 March to 16 April 2020; means, 95% credible intervals (dark grey) and 95% prediction intervals (light grey).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The Trend Direction Index (TDI) for the period 20 March to 16 April 2020, indicating the probability that the population average of each mental-health indicator was increasing or decreasing at specific time points.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – 11 March 2020, https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-re... (2020, accessed 28 April 2020).
    1. Ferguson N, Laydon D, Nedjati Gilani G, et al. Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand. London: Imperial College COVID-19 response team, 2020.
    1. Bao Y, Sun Y, Meng S, et al. 2019-nCoV epidemic: address mental health care to empower society. Lancet 2020;395:e37–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lima CKT, De Medeiros Carvalho PM, Lima IdAS, et al. The emotional impact of Coronavirus 2019-nCoV (new Coronavirus disease). Psychiatry Res 2020;287:112915. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galea S, Merchant RM, Lurie N. The mental health consequences of COVID-19 and physical distancing: the need for prevention and early intervention. JAMA Intern Med 2020;1562. - PubMed