Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;51(2):189-213.
doi: 10.1177/0306312720953515. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

Science, technology, security: Towards critical collaboration

Sam Weiss Evans  1   2 , Matthias Leese  3 , Dagmar Rychnovská  4
Affiliations

Science, technology, security: Towards critical collaboration

Sam Weiss Evans et al. Soc Stud Sci. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Science and technology play a central role in the contemporary governance of security, both as tools for the production of security and as objects of security concern. Scholars are increasingly seeking to not only critically reflect on the interplays between science, technology and security, but also engage with the practices of security communities that shape and are shaped by science and technology. To further help this growth of interest in security topics within science and technology studies (STS), we explore possible modes of socio-technical collaboration with security communities of practice. Bringing together literatures from STS and critical security studies, we identify several key challenges to critical social engagement of STS scholars in security-related issues. We then demonstrate how these challenges played out over the course of three case studies from our own experience in engaging security communities of practice. We use these vignettes to show that there is a rich vein of developments in both theory and practice that STS scholars can pursue by attending to the interplay of science, technology and security.

Keywords: collaboration; critical security studies; engagement; security.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson B. (2010) Security and the future: Anticipating the event of terror. Geoforum 41(2): 227–235.
    1. Anderson B. (2006) Census, map, and museum. In: Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 167–190.
    1. Andrejevic M. (2017) To preempt a thief. International Journal of Communication 11: 879–896.
    1. Aradau C. (2004) Security and the democratic scene: Desecuritization and emancipation. Journal of International Relations and Development 7(4): 388–413.
    1. Austin JL. (2019) Towards an international political ergonomics. European Journal of International Relations 25(4): 979–1006.

Publication types