Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;7(2):e001330.
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001330.

Clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty

Affiliations

Clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty

Anda Bularga et al. Open Heart. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) remains a treatment option for the selected patients with severe aortic stenosis. We examined clinical outcomes and predictors of prognosis in patients undergoing BAV for severe aortic stenosis.

Methods: We identified all patients undergoing BAV from January 2010 to March 2018 (n=167) at a single transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) centre. Patient demographics, investigations, subsequent interventions and clinical outcomes were obtained from electronic health records.

Results: Patients undergoing BAV were elderly (median age 80, IQR 73-86 years) and half (n=87, 52%) were male. All-cause mortality at 30 days and 12 months was 11% and 43%, respectively. Reduce ejection fraction (EF 30%-50%: HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.94; EF <30%: HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.20) was the only independent predictor at baseline of overall mortality. Median survival was 212 (IQR 54-490) days from the index procedure. Mortality at 1 year was lowest in patients who subsequently underwent TAVI or SAVR but high among those who had no further interventions or those who had a repeat BAV (14%, 19%, 60%, 89% respectively, log-rank p<0.001).

Conclusion: BAV as a bridge to definitive aortic valve intervention in carefully selected patients offers acceptable outcomes. These contemporary observational findings demonstrate the ongoing potential utility of BAV in the TAVI era.

Keywords: aortic valve disease; percutaneous valve therapy; valvuloplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Quarterly rates of BAV and subsequent repeat intervention during the study period of January 2010 to March 2018. (TAVI was introduced in the Edinburgh Heart Centre in the last quarter of 2012.) Online supplemental table 3 outlines the number of procedures per year. BAV, balloon aortic valvuloplasty; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Panel plot showing Kaplan-Meier survival curves and corresponding number at risk tables stratified by (A) repeat intervention and (B) index BAV procedure priority. Groups are compared using the log-rank test. BAV, balloon aortic valvuloplasty; SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

References

    1. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. . Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 2006;368:1005–11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iung B, Vahanian A. Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011;8:162–72. 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.202 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thaden JJ, Nkomo VT, Enriquez-Sarano M. The global burden of aortic stenosis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2014;56:565–71. 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.02.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rostagno C. Heart valve disease in elderly. World J Cardiol 2019;11:71–83. 10.4330/wjc.v11.i2.71 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bing R, Cavalcante JL, Everett RJ, et al. . Imaging and impact of myocardial fibrosis in aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:283–96. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.026 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources